haahha I just don't get these kids,what the hell is wrong with them,they don't know true wrestling talent,they cheer a no talent marky mark lookalike and now have the nerve to down a true wrestling organization like tna.
2006-12-02 01:33:56 · 11 answers · asked by steeler nation!!!!!!! 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Haha.. I get what you mean. You answered my question earlier and just so you know, you have ten points coming your way. TNA has got the best talent and skills. The ugliest and the best looking guys are on top over there and it is not about whether you are a face of TNA or not.
Have a nice day!
2006-12-02 02:53:52 · answer #1 · answered by DARIA. - JOINED MAY 2006 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually, a while back, WWE announced to the writers that he was their new guy and to protect him with everything they have. Essentially, he's their new Stone Cold, Rock, and Hulk Hogan. So therefore, WWE is keeping him in the title picture until the sheeple that are in the majority of the fan base get tired of him.
TNA, on the other hand, kept the title on Jarrett so long because Jarrett has a lot of power in the company. Basically, since he holds the book, he's the champ. Part of it too is that he was never really anything big in either WWE or WCW, so he feels he needs to make up for that.
Wow...I spread a little truth and I get a thumbs down...go figure
2006-12-02 01:43:59 · answer #2 · answered by El Bubba 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
TNA has the worst wrestling roster(If you want to call them wrestlers) ever. tna copied the WWE to try to match up but they just cant. Cena is a better wrestler than Samoa Joe and Kurt was showing proof to go to their hexagon looking ring and destroy Samoa Joe with his WWE skills.
2006-12-02 03:51:16 · answer #3 · answered by MAF1113 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The IWC does in comparison to wrestlers who're multiple time champions because of the fact they think of they are no longer worth of having the call after a on an analogous time as. they are asserting they're hyped up because of the fact they curiously bury each physique else and win too lots, even although they lose an analogous volume of cases as any frequent wrestler, they in basic terms win call fits greater. They continually whinge approximately wrestlers who're mainstays in the main important adventure because of the fact its no longer honest, even although those wrestlers are no longer identifying on what they gain this the writers deserve that dislike the main. IKR, finding at those accomplishments, and then the fact that Triple H is a guy, why could he no longer marry the female loves, it had no longer something to do with getting forward in the corporate. The IWC sees a guy like Triple H and that they think of he has had adequate in his profession, yet hes a wrestler, why could he in basic terms drop an entire profession and supply up winning championships after each little thing hes positioned into it? Cena & Orton are 2 of those they dont like because of the fact they win too lots, i already addressed that. part? The IWC are hypocrites, they did no longer whinge while Ric flair replaced into inducted while he replaced into nonetheless competing, or while he replaced into inducted returned. i will positioned their opinion into an difficulty-free word " they don't be responsive to WHAT they choose." WQ1 - i think the win streaks of those 3 adult males is best to a large push for all of them. i mean they constructive are impressing me, have not performed so yet, yet while this is going proper all 3 of those adult males could keep on with in Sheamus' footsteps. WQ2 - of direction. An Orton vs. Sheamus feud for, for my section, the main coveted call in the business company right this moment? The writers can not pass that up, on paper this is a solid feud and the two way it is going down it's going to be a solid feud. WQ3 - i'm no longer liking the hot superstars WWF, OR TNA for that count, are introducing to us. yet thats in basic terms me. i could no longer care much less approximately storylines, for me its all regarding the fits and that they've particularly misplaced the sting they had a pair of years in the past. WQ4 - i dont believe that fact factors to something. i do think of that's a accident that it may factor to that fact, yet i think of thats all that's is a accident. word to the sensible
2016-12-13 18:35:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I never said what your talking about and FYI,TNA wrestling is not any realer than WWE wrestling.It's still choreographed. Tna is just more into the wrestling and wwe is more into the storyline.
2006-12-02 01:41:19 · answer #5 · answered by The wwe diva of 2010 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who in Hades cares about Cena anyway ? He's nothing but a muscle-bound posterboy for Popeye for sure.
2006-12-02 01:41:47 · answer #6 · answered by mathlete1 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Cena is a great champ. He is actually the Doctor of Thugonomics and nobody can beat him for now as such we are gonna keep him forever.
2006-12-02 01:53:38 · answer #7 · answered by James K 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I totally agree with you and WWE copied Samoa Joe's character and gave it to Umaga.
2006-12-02 02:04:42 · answer #8 · answered by HHH 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
TNA and WWE,they all have their pros and cons.
2006-12-02 01:41:48 · answer #9 · answered by WWE Champ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nothings wrong with cena. he's a great champ
2006-12-02 01:37:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋