yes most defiantly...... i also find him strangely attractive especially when hes wearing cords so so wrong
2006-12-02 01:55:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nellynoo 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is a huge difference being an outsider adviser or a journalist, than doing and managing the country. It is easy to advise and criticize, without responsibility and accountability.
He can be a great leader, as you or I can be a great leader also. But first he should learn to manage and to decide (and you also) on every level of the administration (local council, state senate, state government and so on).
2006-12-02 01:33:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by blapath 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2006-12-02 01:30:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For a few days possibly.
But all is not as it seems.
He would soon tire of it as he is a fun guy and it would age him unfairly.
Any way, who exactly does run the country? It certainly isn't politicians
2006-12-02 01:38:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He'd have us all driving TVRs and Aston Martins. No he'd have the country bankrupt in 6 months
2006-12-02 09:57:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yeah yeah yeah 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I've read a few of his books but I think he needs a makeover first,something to get him out of the 80's.He has a gr8 sense of humour.
2006-12-02 01:40:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by MANC & PROUD 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes!!
The best car fanatic in the world should run the country!!
2006-12-02 01:40:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He'd be a lot better than Tony Bleedin Blair.
2006-12-02 01:33:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by mcfifi 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No-he would take over everything, as he normally does. Quentin Wilson..Richard Hammond..Tiff Niddel.....OR(swoon!) Vicky-Butler-Henderson.....OR(delirious!) Moto-Gps Suzy Perry.
2006-12-02 13:14:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree, although he's quite anti establishment though and running the country would sort of make him the establishment.
(if you see what i mean)
2006-12-02 01:31:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋