That is just your partisan perception. Try and use your own mind instead of being a kool-aid drinker for the democrats. Then you can see the s*** stains from both parties and realize that you are being duped if you suscribe to any of these parties. It's like pro wrestling good guys vs. bad guys bullshit. You pick a side and willingly play their stupid game. Stop being a tool.
2006-11-30 23:51:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I recommend that the top cut back for contributions be achieved away with, and that the optimal payouts in retirement nonetheless proceed to be as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social secure practices isn't a "provide away" application yet one that all of us make contributions to love a cost reductions plan, and can be secure against different makes use of via the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? in case you're so aggravating approximately it then why do no longer you; first placed it lower back into the indoors maximum sector and make to have been no can take out money from it for their very own interest, 2nd pay lower back each and every penny you have borrowed from the two Social secure practices and Medicare, 0.33 take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over right here yet never paid a penny to it, and finally have it the comparable for each guy or woman; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they choose something extra they do it on their very own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the financial stytem feeding the imbalances had never been incredibly replaced. They, a set of scholars, stated that each and each physique expenditures of interest could be 3% or much less for each guy or woman to become wealthy if needed (that must be actual additionally to taces). the final financial subject could be, they suggested, whilst there have been no expenditures of interest. Why no longer try this answer? the wealthy might nonetheless be wealthy. My question is: whilst soial secure practices turns right into a topic linked to federal charges, why no longer artwork with a balanced or income funds and spend no extra desirable than is provided in, as any family members has to try for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents with a view to get rules that serve the rustic? God bless united statesa..
2016-12-14 10:18:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know about MOST, but this narrow sliver of extreme Republican/Neocons/thugs that have hijacked the party and presidency most certainly are. But even in the Reagan era Republicans were charactersed as the party of greed and corruption. When a core value is selfishness....what can one expect?
2006-11-30 23:46:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I didn't know having an abnormally large penis made me greedy and untrustworthy
2006-11-30 23:35:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Thank you for stereotyping. Using your logic I will now stereotype minorities and others also. So many to malign, could you recommend a group to start with. How about blacks?
Here we go----
Never mind, I find myself unable to be a closed minded bigot like you. Sorry to disappoint. What next, cross burning on black Republicans lawns. I wouldn't put it past you.
2006-11-30 23:42:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by pedohunter1488 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
lol, Why are most democrates? It's a fraction both groups are corrupt. I'm Inde so this isn't bias
2006-11-30 23:54:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by jack 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its all about the benjamins baby
Its better to be rich and deceptive than poor and whiny
2006-11-30 23:57:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Most? You have reliable statistics to back this up?
2006-11-30 23:37:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Rusting 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Thomas M, that is just the way they are, I am glad you said most not all. I think the greed causes them not to be trusted, and that is one of the reasons that I am a democrat.
2006-11-30 23:30:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Painting with a broad brush aren't you?
2006-11-30 23:30:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋