2006-11-30 23:24:19 · 13 answers · asked by My name's MUD 5 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
This is a very dry area of accurate scientific discovery. Doubtless a hand pushed lawn mower would be better for the environment than either an electric or petrol mower. reagrding whether this could stop the polar ice caps from melting depends on the extent of the damage incurred already. some scientists feel the damage is beyond repair.
2006-12-01 04:58:44 · answer #1 · answered by steven tt 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you referring to a mower with no internal combustion or simply one that lacks self propulsion? I suppose if it is the former you may claim that every little bit helps, but one must keep some basic engineering in mind: when you wish to change a performance characteristic (green house gas emissions in this case) you first focus on those things which have the greatest effect.
2006-11-30 23:27:10 · answer #2 · answered by DJL2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have over an acre of grass to cut & if you think I'm going to cut it with a push mower U got another thing coming, it's just not possible. I think everyone should find another means of tranportasion is what u should be changing.If we didn't need all that gas for cars, u wouldn't need all thoughs gas production plants that spew out tons of polution every minute.
2006-11-30 23:32:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
in accordance with ice cream intake figures, the right 5 human being flavors in words of share of phase interior united statesa. are: vanilla (26%), chocolate (12.9%) neapolitan (4.8%) strawberry (4.3%) cookies n' cream (4.0%) and that i respect chocolate icecream from the constrained alternatives given. If there have been different alternatives i'd have chosen another flavour. although, in maximum established eating places the alternative you're given are very constrained and it will be the three flavours you've given so i imagine you probably did reliable. There are too many flavours and differences (like personalities) so the three worry-free classic ones are a reliable idea. although, the chocolate personality did not adventure mine. i'm no longer reserved, very chatty, open, pleasant, outgoing, sure, love artwork, no longer sensible about Indie Rock.
2016-11-30 00:22:58 · answer #4 · answered by england 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That really depends on what else we do with our time, if we all take holidays that mean flying here and there, it really won't help. If you are interested in helping the planet find out more about the environment through the Internet, TV, books etc.
2006-11-30 23:32:04 · answer #5 · answered by funnelweb 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
and the ultimate cure for obeseity. send the burger munchers out and see how long they last. obviously anything that saves power or fuel will benefit the earth. but it will only help to slow down the process of global warming. so but a house in the hills and move soon.
2006-11-30 23:34:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
But only slightly. It's factories and vehicles that are causing all this carbon monoxide build up and devestating our beautiful planet.
We're all so lazy these days....
2006-11-30 23:26:54 · answer #7 · answered by KENNY G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would have the same effect as a fart in a thunderstorm.
2006-11-30 23:26:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn`t do for me with my two acres.
2006-11-30 23:33:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe a little bit...ppl would get some good exercise though, that's for sure!
2006-11-30 23:26:37 · answer #10 · answered by pirate00girl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋