who would you rather have in your team? and why?
2006-11-30 22:54:32 · 19 answers · asked by theincrediblewunian 1 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
Lennon and he was in my team till Leeds sold him to Spurs.
2006-12-01 01:33:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lennon. Walcott needs more experience.
2006-12-01 09:44:56 · answer #2 · answered by fubar18ad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lennon without a shadow of a doubt.
Walcott is useless.
2006-12-01 11:13:20 · answer #3 · answered by Sluugy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Walcott all the way. The Lad is a mega star in the making, he not only has amazing pace but superb ball control and is hte "ice man" in front of goal. Them two goals against the German U21 were world class.
He should have been put on in the world cup when all the stikers were either injured or red carded. Hoepfully the new manager will be more adventurous. This sort of player is a defenders worst nightmare.
2006-12-01 09:25:10 · answer #4 · answered by Ganymede 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LENNON at least with him you know what you are getting, with walcott I would be a bit worried as he is a bit of a mystery
2006-12-01 07:11:04 · answer #5 · answered by madge 51 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both good players...but at the moment Lennon is def the best...he's had more experience,even though only a kid! he never gives up,even though he's been played out of position a few times this season at Spurs.he's always great for England. got to be the fastest and one of the most skilful wingers i've ever seen!
He will stay at Spurs and become a massive star,for Spurs and England!
2006-12-01 07:05:57 · answer #6 · answered by Andy H2 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would have both i cant choose coz lennon has got the speed and skill down the wing and walcott has got the presence in the centre
2006-12-01 07:03:16 · answer #7 · answered by Craig C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
for me , theo walcott is the player i would like to have in my team..
he hes many talents,great pace,good goal instinct,and many more.although lennon have higher reputation but he is only 17.. he have a lots of time to go higher.. i think he will be just like arjen robben or beckham in the next season..so walcott is da best for me
2006-12-01 07:03:13 · answer #8 · answered by earl 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Walcott, best player always selected to good team
2006-12-01 07:56:59 · answer #9 · answered by winnie m 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
man they are both excellent, but lennon wasnt as well known at 17 as walcott is now....walcott is electric when he plays...well they both are excellent...i would have both in my team.....but if i really had to choose id choose lennon...his form is more consistant...he always plays good..plus he always gets first team football..he is an enthusiastic winger....and very determined...and very very fast...but they both play excellent football for their ages..they both are world class talents.
2006-12-01 08:00:04 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋