watched a program earlier about a place that makes the money like £5 and £10's, why dont we just create loads more and use it to feed poor, not just that but use the money to build more homes for the homless etc etc??
2006-11-30 21:55:53 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
It would de-value our money. Oh, wait...they only make money for the rich ... to de-value our money. (see "Federal Reserve unconstitutional") We work an hour to earn ten bucks and they print a twenty in two seconds and hand it to their buddies. Then when we want to spend our ten, they say, "we already have twenty. why would we want your ten? Give us thirty, then we'll have something to value; suckerrrr!"
Besides, as the current business structures are, the poor would only get little use of it; spend it on a little food, and it's gone. Then once it's back in the hands of the rich, they'll use it the same way they did the other money.
2006-12-02 18:10:12 · answer #1 · answered by sincere12_26 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they should do that I don't know why they arnt I think they enjoy watching people suffer
2014-05-15 22:03:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is a nice concept,but,many more people than the poor themselves make their living off of the poor.DR.'s,nurses,socialworkers,mental health workers, the clergy.the public appearance of these individuals must also be considered.people make good money from other people suffering.change that.
2006-12-01 06:05:23 · answer #3 · answered by stratoframe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
good idea.i do appreciate your way of thinking. one thing let me tell me you. to look after poor people food,shelter,cloth goverment is there. (we are paying them indirectly to them by paying tax) for higher class they have money etc etc. left over is middle class.he is the fellow suffers everytime. neither he can reach top nor he can downwards.
in this society there are threetypes of people.
ATYPE. HIGHLYEDUCATED.HIGH LINKS ,RICH, THRU CONTACT HE WILL MOVE AND MOVE UP. HE NEVER COMES DOWN.
BTYPE.--MIDDLE CLASS FELLOW. FRONT HE STEPS WELL
BACK HE STEPS PIT.(HOPE U MIGHT HAVE UNDERSTOOD)
C-TYPE. POOR FELLOW HE CAN BECOME RICH OTHERWIDE HE CAN REMAIN AS IT IS.
THERE IS NO EGO PROBLEM FOR HIM. WHERE AS MIDDLE CLASS FELLOW EGO ,MEDIOCRISY.
Now u tell me is it right?
2006-12-01 06:13:08 · answer #4 · answered by sarath m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would de-value the money.
Which in turn would lift interest rates.
Which only exacerbates the initial problem.
2006-12-01 06:11:04 · answer #5 · answered by mjdoubled 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋