2006-11-30 21:45:19 · 5 answers · asked by MariE 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
To me he's an artist and a role model for GREAT rock music..NEVER a public enemy number 1..I never get tired listening to his music..Everyone has their own style of bringing up music, so does Marilyn Manson..
2006-12-01 02:37:16 · answer #1 · answered by Cassie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well..i always dug him (so much so that i saw him 3 times, but that is beside the point)...artist..?...depends on your definition of artist..i consider him one...but at the same time, Avril Lavigne could be considered an artist as well....public enemy #1..?..i am neither christian nor offended by him, so no...but, i do think that some of his stuff shouldn't be heard until you can understand it....and as for having redeeming qualities, when did music need to have those..?..if you want redeeming qualities, go listen to the guy singing to old people in the cancer ward...may not be stuff you like, but it is redeeming.....why can't music just be...?
2006-12-01 06:24:05 · answer #2 · answered by beat_terrorist 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer not to think about him *at all*, thank you very much.
For all that, I do know that he wasn't the nerd in Wonder Years, nor does he actually claim to have affiliations with the Church of Satan. Rumors, you know.
I guess he's quite normal and probably a bit smart, outside of his day job.
2006-12-01 07:57:27 · answer #3 · answered by Multi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was great as the nerd in 'The Wonder Years'
2006-12-01 05:49:17 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
noise without function....music ceases to be music and or art when it has no redeeming value.
2006-12-01 05:52:11 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋