Should our bills be printed in different size or have some marking that allow blinds to tell which is 1, 5, 10, 20... etc? Or is that too expensive and impractical?
2006-11-30 21:12:54 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
thats what families are for
theres always someone there to take care of a blind person even if theyre not family
not worth the confusion and hassles and costs
2006-11-30 21:20:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
We should go back to coinage since paper currency is unconstitutional.
During the Revolution the Continental Congress tried to fund the Revolution with paper currency. Congress authorized printing more money than they should have, thus not only an inflationary result but essentially made it worthless.
So, at the Constitutional Convention the decision was made that our currency should have a certain intrinsic value. Paper currency only have fiat value.
2006-12-01 06:51:12 · answer #2 · answered by .45 Peacemaker 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Hate handing over a 20 by mistake.
2006-12-01 05:21:49 · answer #3 · answered by Julio Cesar C 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We have had brail on our money for a while, it is good to start off but over time and general use and people washing money by mistake, the brail does not hold its integrity. A longer lasting solution needs to be found.
2006-12-01 06:37:01 · answer #4 · answered by Cherry_Blossom 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it should. I mean not all blind people are lucky enough to be living with someone to help them and are pretty much completely dependant on other people's honesty.
2006-12-01 07:28:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why not? Here are two reasons why we should....
1. Help the blind so that people won't take advantage or their disadvantage. Yes, there are people who will.
2. It would help us fight counterfitters.
2006-12-01 05:23:48 · answer #6 · answered by baKeD^ N 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋