What did you think of OJ Simpson's Crazy book?

Question

I was like WHAT? Pardon me!! Has the world gone mad? Wow...talk about a spit take...

Answer 1

I hope he gets nasty paper cut on his neck by his own book and die. If they ever print hard copies and put them in store I'll buy all million copies wipe my poop on it and throw them at his face.

Answer 2

Likely there's very few offers for OJ to earn extra income and some people would not blame him for accepting a rare opportunity to get a needed paycheck which could pay some bills, help out relatives, leave his children an inheritance etc. He was found "not guilty" and has always maintained his innocence. The book and interview should be available as a CHOICE for anyone to either check it out or not. OJ is likely not being narcissistic and a great portion of the book/interview is probably defending himself against false allegations. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see the rumored large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to say with absolute certainty that this man is guilty.

Answer 3

Well, the book isn't coming out any more, so, somehow, I get the feeling that you've never read it and you just want to talk about books to appear cultured. Much like the people here who are just regurgitating things they've heard in the TV footage of his trial.

Answer 4

Will I have never been convinced he did it, because from the pictures I have seen of Nichole and Ron they had to have been killed with a machete not a dagger like the court tried to claim. And a machete is a Colombians weapon of choice.

Answer 5

I think that he did commit the murders AND he's making a mockery of it because he knows that he can get away with it...hence the book.

Answer 6

Anything now a days to make a buck! HA I would probally read it though if I was bored or something......or wanted to plan a murder or opps not plan a murder

Answer 7

I never read it and won't pay the outrageous cost for it (it was never published ) is what I hear