She's not even hot anymore, its almost like a waste of time.
Although she was hot for her wedding, so the video will sell like no other DVD ever.
Does this count as a "preview" for the movie?
Whats your opinion?
2006-11-30
17:39:46
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Celebrities
And if you've seen the pictures, there's little orbs in the pictures.
Some people claim thats what ghost or spirits look like on film, and theres up to 3 in some of the pictures floating around britney
2006-11-30
17:44:15 ·
update #1
When I first saw the pics, I thought to myself, damn all the money Brittney has, she can not afford a pair of panties. I really wonder what the heck she is doing with her money. She is a bad influence on young girls. I will never look at Brittney the same way again after looking at those pics. I think she is just pure NASTY!
2006-11-30 18:02:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by pinkybrains1 1
·
4⤊
1⤋
You say that like you'd kick her out of bed for eating crackers. Just tell the truth. You have enough interest in her to type the question, so you don't "not care".
The crotch shots were all the rage of talk radio today in Chicago, but most of the websites that were hosting them have already removed them. One host I was listening to said that they used so much computing power that they dimmed the lights in the Hancock Building looking for them.
2006-11-30 17:45:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by DA 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yeah, I've heard of it. And no, I don't really care to see it. She's a fat, f'ugly, skanky, trailer-park trash cow. The last thing I need to see is that white-trash porker with no pants on. Yuck! If I want to see naked women, I could find some porn online that features women who are actually hot! Haha...
2006-11-30 17:52:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by The Man In The Box 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The only individual who could benefit from said "preview" is her gynecologist.
Or if shaved white clams is your favorite menu option at the all-you-can-eat buffet.
2006-11-30 17:43:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by PD 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
I have, and whoa. She really let herself go. But then as they say, any kind of publicity is still publicity.
2006-11-30 17:58:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by chismaxqueen 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have seen them. She looked drunk and sickly. You could see her scar from her Cesarean and she needed makeup. Her legs looked banged up and bruised...
I think its funny to watch this happen to stars. :)
2006-11-30 17:43:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
it looked like any old pu**y, nothing special. I did not care for the c-section scar though!
2006-11-30 17:43:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by ruy2kok2day 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
She's definitely not up to my standards with her sharp knees and all.
2006-11-30 17:44:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
i saw them and they were just so skank! who doesn't where panties when they go out? give me a break - - thats just trashy!
2006-11-30 17:42:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by bryantgirl25 1
·
1⤊
1⤋