English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Yea...1 fourth of the population is retarded--just look at the bell--curve...another fourth is subhuman, and 1 fourth is normal...and then like 1 fourth is 'smart'..this is how we get our average of '100'

I am not putting others down...I am just saying...if this (1) retarded fourth---is true...then should we regard 'mainstream' entertainment as retarded? after all, mainstream entertainment is engineered to appeal to the masses to maximize their profit (movie studios...have to be sure of a guaranteed buck or they go broke)...so if (2) is true...then...

is general media also retarded...and does this mean then that we should recognize the general media as subhuman? since smarter people cannot appreciate it? sometimes looking for something to like, but finding nothing because it can only be appreciated it by the retarded portion of the population?

2006-11-30 16:55:59 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

south park is awesome (1)..

south park is the only media independent enough not to cater to retardation (2)

mainstream media is retarded (3) assuming a good portion of the population is retarded..

if (1) and (2) is true...Then, if south park raises a point, then would it not make sense to raise the very real possibility of (3)?

2006-11-30 17:02:29 · update #1

south park made the point of (4) making fun of the retardation of truthers--by making a fleeting joke of (5) 1/4 of the population is retarded...(this can or cannot be true...made in joke)

however, retardation is classified as 75 or below...IQ...subhuman below 100...

more than 1/4 (this is undisputed) is definitely subhuman (below 100)...actually more going towards 1/3 or even 1/2...

so, if retarded is to be defined as (6) below 100 IQ..

does it not make sense that since south park is (2)...and making a comment of (5)...does it not raise the very real possibility of (6)?

upon further analysis of the bell curve

http://www.has.vcu.edu/psy/psy101/forsyth/normal.gif

you will find my original hypothisis to be correct.

on the left side of the bell curve...again, our definition of retarded...you have, respectably...34%, 14% and 2%...neglecting the small off centered percentage.

Using the simple rules of addition---34 + 14 +2 = 50%

This means that under our

2006-11-30 17:07:52 · update #2

definition....

50%!!!! of the population is retarded.

using formal definitions...85 or below for retarded in the United States...then 17% of the population is retarded!!!!!

If you take into account that hispanics and immigrants have a bell curve that is sometimes shfited to the left by 10 poitns...and given their percentage points...you will find that you get an extra 5% ....I would give you the statistics ...but I don't remmember the site..

This gives a very respectable...22% of the population...and if you take a couple percentage points...

you come to the very good estimate, that one fourth of the North America (excluding Canada) population is retarded..

Thus by (2), and (6), arising the very realy hypothisis of 1/4 of the population is retarded...opening the line of inquiry that yields us to a rough estimate of 1/4...

Thus, coincidentally...the very openminded show, has given a very factual representation of the intellect of the populace.

2006-11-30 17:12:05 · update #3

something spongebob and invader zim....

which are known to cater to the general masses--could never fleet to mention..for it caters to the general populace...

2006-11-30 17:13:09 · update #4

in fact, if you have ever watched either of those two shows...you will notice that you feel like you are becoming retarded...its a known effect called the "spongebob syndrome"..

Simpsons and south park..are different, often hailed by the intellectuals and academia alike as funny and intellectually satisfying shows...unlike the more retarded shows...which are only indulged by those of higher intellect due to the very retardation it entails.

2006-11-30 17:14:35 · update #5

kind of like making fun.

2006-11-30 17:14:45 · update #6

let me correct (6)...1/4 of the population is retarded (fact, not joke)...(5) is reference to the joke made in south park, as a fleeting reference to truthers being retarded (making fun of). Yet making the joke of 1/4 of population being retarded.

2006-11-30 17:19:49 · update #7

yet not established as truth, but merely a joke.

2006-11-30 17:20:40 · update #8

7 answers

It might have been only one fourth at one time but ignorance does and is spreading. The media is having to try to fit into everyones level which means the ignorant people need to understand them also.

2006-11-30 17:45:25 · answer #1 · answered by Sean 7 · 0 0

Hmm. The average person compared to the smartest person in the world is retarded. And mainstream media appeals to the average person. Therefore mainstream media is retarded. Or is it?

I'm going to use the word "retarded" in lieu of "average."

But personally i think youtube is even more retarded than mainstream media (the popular videos, not the site). And youtube videos are chosen by the people. So mainstream media does not perfectlly appeal to the masses, assuming youtube is more popular.

So anyways mainstream media can have different levels in it, the higher levels that the retarded people cannot understand so they ignore and the lower levels appeal to them. Like the simpsons, which has comedy that appeals to adults and children on different levels. mainstream media can be appreciated by the intelligent few and the retarded majority because although they do have to appeal to the masses, it does not mean they cannot appeal to the intelligent too. For example stephen colbert. The retarded people who do not understand his satire will take him for a republican while the more intelligent will see what he really is. This shows that the retarded will think they understand the show perfectly fine and so will the intelligent, and when both think they understand the show it appeals to them.

So to conclude, the different levels in mainstream media can allow it to appeal to everyone, and everyone is more than just the retarded population, so this would be the logical choice to increase their profits as they get more viewers.

2006-12-01 18:53:41 · answer #2 · answered by Chris C 2 · 0 0

Okay, not a terrible analogy, however you're giving a lot of credit to society when saying only 1/4 is simple minded (I cant say retarded since thats not politically correct). However I would say in a generalistic way that half of society has no clue, the other half is split between people on the right path to having a clue and those that actually do have a clue.

2006-11-30 17:01:22 · answer #3 · answered by Murfdigidy 4 · 0 0

Yes, in other words if you want intelligent programming you have to watch "Spongebob" or "Invader Zim", everything else is just politically correct drivel, obscene jokes and lots and lots of sex appeal.

2006-11-30 17:00:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Retarded in the clinical sense?

2006-11-30 17:01:10 · answer #5 · answered by candace b 7 · 0 0

Mabey you should try to come up with your own questions and stop stealing points from SouthPark.

2006-11-30 16:58:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

"EARTH IS AN INSANE ASYLUM, TO WHICH THE OTHER PLANETS DEPORT THEIR LUNATICS." --Voltaire
they play to advertisers; just substitute insane with retarded consumers if you like....

2006-11-30 17:02:21 · answer #7 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers