English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I need to know this in like, 10 minutes. Please help me.

2006-11-30 15:47:11 · 10 answers · asked by Brown Eyes 2 in Arts & Humanities Books & Authors

10 answers

The word "Nazi" is a German abbreviation of the name of Hitler's political party -- the Nazionalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiter Partei. In English this translates to "The National Socialist German Worker's Party". So Hitler was a socialist and a champion of the workers -- or at least he identified himself as such and campaigned as such.

There have been many proposed explanations of Hitler's influence and deeds but nearly all of the social scientific explanations very rapidly come up with the word "insanity" or one of its synonyms (e.g. Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson & Sanford, 1950). Attributing mental illness or mental disturbance to Hitler seems to be the only way that many people can deal with his malign legacy.
So who put that manifesto forward and who was responsible for the summary quotes given before that? Was it the US Democrats, the British Labour Party, the Canadian Liberals, some European Social Democratic party? No. The manifesto is an extract from the (February 25th., 1920) 25 point plan of the National Socialist German Workers Party and was written by the leader of that party: Adolf Hitler. And the preceding summary quotes were also from him (See towards the end of Mein Kampf and OSullivan, 1983. p. 138).

The rest of Hitler's mainfesto was aimed mainly at the Jews but in Hitler's day it was very common for Leftists to be antisemitic. And the increasingly pervasive anti-Israel sentiment among the modern-day Left -- including the Canadian government -- shows that modern-day Leftists are not even very different from Hitler in that regard. Modern-day anti-Israel protestors still seem to think that dead Jews are a good thing

2006-11-30 18:20:59 · answer #1 · answered by Darrell R 1 · 0 0

maximum of it particularly is theory. to understand the authentic reason will take somewhat learn, yet here's a tenet. whilst attempting to construct an empire, maximum judgements are strategic, no longer own. He would have hated Jews, yet evaluate what strategic fee eliminating the jews offered. For one, the Rothschild family individuals controlled substantial banks, mining, production and different materials. those are materials Hitler confiscated. What different materials did the Nazi's confiscate by ostracizing the Jews? What else did they administration? i think a minimum of a few of them had substantial financial sources and administration of key infrastructure or production pastimes that Hitler mandatory. Or they might have represented a hazard as a unified team that would oppose him. confident, it exchange into functional to have a "person-friendly enemy" or scapegoat to unify the german human beings against, yet that would have been a secondary benefit to gaining administration of key sources and banking. think of roughly it like a tyrant would think of roughly it. If the gang it particularly is maximum in all hazard to oppose you besides mght has administration of substantial materials, what do you do? you're making them the enemy.

2016-10-04 14:19:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

hitlers propaganda.. he was nothing more than a bitter artist who wanted power, and resented the illusion that jews were too intelligent, and caused WW1. Its this big hostorical thingy, w/ Germans economic system after ww1 (because they owed 33 billion dollars to America, or Europe i 4get) and out of anger hitler blames them. back to the point, because fe hated on em. He wasnt the 1st. Anti Semetist startwed before him in Austra.. i heard it was normal for a political leader to say how bad the Jews were, and how they needed to be exterminated. What Hitler did (pre holocaust) actually how he thought was normal back then. What he did was hoorrible. pardon the spelling

2006-11-30 16:31:18 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

All of those answers above but also:

- Germany was hurting economically after the first World War, people were starving and the German dollar was weakening... The Jews were well skilled and owned many businesses so that's one of the reason that they were targeted. When people are hungry, out of work and angry it becomes quite easy to listen to propoganda that blames a race of people for their misfortune...

2006-11-30 16:35:21 · answer #4 · answered by Tammy R 2 · 0 0

I agree we can be here all night but to some everything up
Hitler picked on the jews for many reasons
1. the interfer with his vision of a perfect race..because he thougth that there was only one perfect race
2. also because supposly the jews kill christ
3. he didnt just pick on jews but on gyspsis(sp?), homosexuals, cripples
basically anyone who wouldnt join them or fit in the description of blonde hair and blue eyes

2006-11-30 16:09:11 · answer #5 · answered by Yvette 2 · 1 0

First check your spelling on Nazis.

Hitler used hatred of Jews as a platform and rallying cry for the Nazi movement. This galvanized the people and gave them all a common enemy.

It is important to remember however that the Nazis and German armed forces killed as many, if not more, Christians during WWII.

2006-11-30 15:55:42 · answer #6 · answered by cuddycab 2 · 0 1

In the absence of any reasoned political discourse a scapegoat makes a great rallying point.

2006-11-30 17:20:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Are you kidding me? we could be here all night. And it wasn't just the jews, it was anyone that didn't fir into Hitler's vision of Germany's future.

2006-11-30 15:56:22 · answer #8 · answered by know_it_all_NOT 3 · 1 0

becuase they are racist! and evil people.

2006-11-30 16:18:59 · answer #9 · answered by Lizzie 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers