2006-11-30 15:33:52 · 10 answers · asked by gdeach 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I am sorry I didnt give any credit to the do nothing senate and congressional majorities
2006-11-30 17:10:09 · update #1
Bush spent a year talking about it and the results are just as successful as his Iraq policy. Michael knows, those deficits are a backdoor way to ruin social programs. They underestimate The American people.
2006-11-30 16:18:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Amazing.
I thought social security didn't need fixing. Haven't the democrats platformed in the past (before their "no plan" run) against SS reform? Haven't dems told seniors that Republicans would do away with SS?
Now you're criticizing Mr. Bush for not fixing it? WOW!
2006-11-30 15:43:27 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes, put the nation so far into debt that all social programs will be bankrupt and unfundable. That will fix social security alright. Bush comes from and espouses the bloodline that says "Let them eat cake."
2006-11-30 15:40:48 · answer #3 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What are you talking about? Bush has not fixed anything. Privatization is not the answer for social security.
2006-11-30 16:02:39 · answer #4 · answered by Katherine 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
he did not fix social security. You are kidding right. Just goes to show you what a lack of education can do.
2006-11-30 15:37:31 · answer #5 · answered by copestir 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Just shows what you, an average american guy, has done right? They are currently trying to solve the issue escpecially having the new democratic congrss take over.
2006-11-30 15:36:47 · answer #6 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clinton proposed putting the budget surplus into Social safe practices. Bush spent the surplus and further us decrease back right into a deficit. maximum Democrats at the on the spot are offering elevating the $ninety,000 cap on which persons pay FICA taxes on. Hillary Clinton needs to manage the irritating situations with the aid of economic accountability . Please web site a source which exhibits a unmarried Democrat saying there is not any challenge and that each body the Republicans who've addressed the challenge are dropping time and stirring up discontent for the sake of votes.
2016-11-28 03:00:16 · answer #7 · answered by mimbsjr 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, I would be happy with a ss just like our congressmen and senators get, theirs is not going to run out.
President Bush proposed one such as theirs but the democrats wouldn't go along with it. Why?
2006-11-30 15:40:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
he tried the libs shot it down so blame them all that crap i heard from them "hands of my social security" but once it goes bankrupt they wont have social security
2006-11-30 15:46:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Wow.
2006-11-30 15:37:55 · answer #10 · answered by Shaddup Libs 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋