Last week this was a no brainer, but my position is changing.
I'm interested in all your thoughts, but the guys more so.
This is 2 childrens mother. I feel very bad for them.
2006-11-30 15:04:30 · 24 answers · asked by blessed mommy 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Lets face facts. The person who is really going to end up getting the kids is either Brit's nanny or K-fed's nanny. So the question isn't who would be the better parent, the question is who can hire the best help because it's the help that's going to end up raising those kids while Brit and K-fed spend their time partying.
2006-11-30 15:10:44 · answer #1 · answered by jjmlls 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neither of them should. Britney was always going on about how she really wanted kids now that she has 2 boys what is she doing? Getting nannies to mind them while she's out partying and showing off all her private bits!! Theres people out there who can't have kids so both Britney and K-fed should stop being so selfish and stop thinking about themselves for once and think about whats best for their children. I feel really sorry for the children.
2006-11-30 23:28:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
From the looks of things, Britney Spears is too "busy" partying these days with friends like Paris Hilton and Lindsey Lohan until the wee hours of the night. What is a person with two small children at home partying like a wild child? Britney needs to take responsibility. She decided to have children, so she should accept her motherhood! Britney needs to grow up.
2006-11-30 23:09:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the K-fed should get the kids.
i mean he now has a goo career && we'll how that goes well for him. Unlike Britney when she was passed out, where were her kids? i hope she don't expect that her mother will take of them!
Brit is not too good of a mother.
So, my opinio, K-fed should get the kids.
2006-11-30 23:06:57 · answer #4 · answered by [CooKie] {♥} 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I like to read celeb gossip, but who are we to decide who someone's kids should go to just because that person just happens to be famous? I agree, Britney is being irresponsible, especially taking her kids WITH her out with Paris, but I've seen way worse parents and Kevin never seemed to care too much about Brit's babies, anyways.
2006-11-30 23:15:48 · answer #5 · answered by Nicole 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Department of Human Services.
2006-11-30 23:12:45 · answer #6 · answered by Captain Hammer 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's not our business. The courts will decide the children's welfare. It's not like Brit goes out and leaves them in a closet. They have several nannies.
FedEx is a total loss in all directions. Britney is a huge hormone and not very bright.
Maybe Madonna should adopt their kids
2006-11-30 23:07:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm going to be honest with you how about Brittney's mom. I just don't understand what's wrong with Brittney. She has 2 children to take care of and all she's doing is partying. It seem like all Kevin wants to do is party so there is no good choice here.
2006-11-30 23:15:26 · answer #8 · answered by Marenight 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they both would make horrible parents. some people say britney because she has the money to take care of them but money does not buy love or parenting skills. i mean she can buy them nice clothes and millions of nannies but it cant teach her not to party and smoke around them and shower her goodies to paparrazi when she gets out of cars. if i was the kids i rather be in a nice loving family than a rich messed up one.
2006-11-30 23:16:44 · answer #9 · answered by wtfitsnguyen 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I say the kids deserve an adoptive family with parents who have a sense of maturity.
2006-11-30 23:08:42 · answer #10 · answered by thezaylady 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋