English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why is it ,that when we choose to register a baby, we don't get that option? And yet some men may still need a DNA sample to prove who the baby belongs to?
Are car registrations enough proof for children? or should we DNA all cars too?

2006-11-30 14:15:41 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

mwh p. Lol! whatever next?!

2006-11-30 14:29:49 · update #1

7 answers

Yeah - let's DNA all cars too.
Good idea, bud.

2006-11-30 14:24:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Quite frankly no, private registration isn't enough! There are still actions that arise to "Quiet Title", even when the car is privately registered.
As for the kid....well, would YOU want to pay child support for a kid that might not be yours? I wouldn't!

2006-11-30 22:40:11 · answer #2 · answered by cyanne2ak 7 · 1 0

u gotta say your talking about your guns so that you can say i have myself registered as a gun owner and i don't want to register what guns and number to the man, think about how it will be when there are no more American manufacture s OOps, that's all ready here okay think about when they wont manufacture any more ammo, that has all of my friends buying the mega shipments of bullets I've ever seen and I've seen allot as a army brat

2006-11-30 23:08:01 · answer #3 · answered by bev 5 · 1 0

With babies, you can pretty much tell who the father is by looking at key features, such as eyes. With cars, it is much harder to tell as there is no physical likeness.

2006-12-01 09:28:38 · answer #4 · answered by vijay_rangari 2 · 1 0

Abandoned vehicles don't need any maintenance!

2006-12-01 11:20:12 · answer #5 · answered by brainlady 6 · 1 0

What are you on?

2006-11-30 22:17:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

what......

2006-11-30 23:31:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers