English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

(Serious answers please: No bullies, lynch mobs or messenger- haters)

Gingrich said in New Hampshire recently that you could be recruited by terrorists and so your access to the internet should be denied.

"I want to suggest to you that we right now should be impaneling people to look seriously at a level of supervision that we would never dream of if it weren't for the scale of the threat."

"I am not running for President," said Gingrich, "I am seeking to create a movement win the future with a series of solutions that are so compelling that If the American people say I HAVE TO BE PRESIDENT, IT WILL HAPPEN."

If Senator Gingrich has the right to say whatever crazy things he wants, shouldn't you have the right to express yourself anyway you want as well?

2006-11-30 13:32:05 · 7 answers · asked by Reba K 6 in News & Events Current Events

7 answers

I try to ignore old Newt as much as possible.

2006-11-30 13:34:19 · answer #1 · answered by bibliophile31 6 · 0 1

each and every aspect are spinning the certain election in Hawaii's 1st district. The Republicans say that they gained a particular election the position Republicans have not gained for a lengthy time period, which shows their ability. Democrats discuss that their vote became chop up, and they might have gained in the adventure that they'd a danger to easily run a unmarried candidate. even as that's authentic, the Democrats fail to discuss that the district is liberal adequate that in maximum circumstances, a Democrat would have gained inspite of a chop up vote. So it shows Republican ability, yet no longer as a lot ability because the Republicans pick you to believe. besides, the certain election in Pennsylvania's twelfth district shows Republican weak spot in a really conservative district. besides, a Republican presidential victory in 2012 isn't guaranteed. although, Gingrich or Romney are probable quite reliable photos for growing president.

2016-11-30 00:03:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Newt is and always has been a theoretician.. an idea guy. Never an executive type. He was lousy once he actually got to be Speaker and actually had to run things. BTW... he never was a Senator, either.

You, me, and Newt have the eternal right to say anything we want, anytime we want...

2006-11-30 14:07:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If he isn't running, why is he in New Hampshire now? It's the traditional time to test the wind in certain states. He has right to say whatever he says, as do I. You do too, of course.

2006-11-30 13:38:29 · answer #4 · answered by Susan M 7 · 0 0

He's a nut and a psycho. Don't even worry about him. Liberals and Conservatives hate him. He couldn't win a game of bingo.

2006-11-30 13:40:30 · answer #5 · answered by hootchykootchybebop 1 · 0 0

he wants to prevent terriosiom but hes a fool hes just taking away ppls enjoyments

2006-11-30 13:35:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

narrow minded bookburners have always been among us, old newt shouls chech himself into some looneybin.

2006-12-01 14:00:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers