The only instance of animals dying in the ANWR is the caribou because they pass a pipe site, it was a coincedence that they were killed, it really won't affect the animals. Also, with the war and everything prices are going to be high for a long time, a private supply would give us oil for a long time! If you were at my school watching my groups presentation on why we should drill you would've had a more elaborate reason, sorry i can't give you more reasons, don't have the time.
2006-11-30 13:38:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Blarhbhb 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
in actuality (something the "environmentalists" are not utilising) there is little threat in drilling for oil in ANWR. verify out how insignificant the environmental effect has been with the Trans Alaska Pipeline, very nearly each and all the flora and fauna alongside the pipe line has remained solid if no longer certainly more suitable. Now evaluate the more suitable technologies we could decrease the probabilities of spills and to freshen up any certainly spills additionally pondering the extensive fines which would be levied against any company that does screw up it particularly is noticeably unlikely that oil businesses would something much less that very careful of their movements. jointly as we can not thoroughly do away with the flair for environmental harm we are left with few different authentic techniques impressive now different than to do no longer something and desire we enhance decision power materials. BTW people who choose to throw around the words "a pristine barren area" whilst discussing ANWR have in all hazard in no way been to that area of Alaska or have even seen photos of this barren frozen barren area panorama.
2016-10-04 14:12:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Weighing the amount of oil that could be gotten against the damage to the environment. Soo they say they won't destroy the environment, and I'm to believe that when they can't manage the Alaskan pipeline and avoid spills. In west Texas oil field country you can't drink the water cause it has been contaminated. Sorry there just isn't enough oil, the Governor of Alaska is going to have to find another source of revenue.
2006-11-30 13:39:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by longroad 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't understand why it's even an issue; why should there even be such a thing as a 'national wildlife refuge'? Public property...isn't. It becomes a zone of nothing. I say sell that land off.
2006-11-30 13:33:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The amount of oil that would be found in the reserve would barely make a dent on the amount we import from the Middle East but would suceed in destroying one of the few natural envirnoments left in the country. I am all for ending our oil addiction, but this is not the way to do it.
2006-11-30 13:31:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by John S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
IT IS SOME TOP SHELF OIL, THE ANIMALS CAN ADAPT AS THEY HAVE AND FLURSHED IN THE AREAS THEY ARE CURRENTLY DRILLING.
2006-11-30 13:31:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
we need the oil, wont kill the wildlife
2006-11-30 13:31:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't drill. We will kill all the animals.
2006-11-30 13:34:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Senator D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
WE SHOULDN'T DESTROY SOMETHING THAT BEAUTIFUL FOR 18 MONTHS WORTH OF OIL.
2006-11-30 13:35:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋