English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-30 13:22:53 · 24 answers · asked by D*Rock 71 3 in Sports Wrestling

24 answers

Yes TNA sucks and for everyone who is talking s*** about the wwe wrestlers why dont you get in the ring with them and see how you do.Vince Mcmahon is the king of the wrestling world didnt you guys learn anything from WCW and ECW he will take over TNA too and shut it down because noone wants to see or be in a retarted ring with 6 sides and then I will be here laughing at all you TNA lovers.
P.S. TNA only has wrestlers who r not good enough for wwe the best TNA has is Kurt Angel and he has been beaten by many WWE wrestlers

2006-11-30 17:52:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes. TNA is not bad but I believe WWE is still more entertaining. They have better gimmicks, better storylines and i guess the fact that they'e a bigger company helps them maintain a higher quality program. TNA is growing and it might be better some day, I don't think it is right now, though.

2006-11-30 14:59:19 · answer #2 · answered by Olga 2 · 0 0

You have a question, i have an answer
I think that WWE is better TNA because probably the main reason for other fans are that because it is longer, but i think it is better because even though it is fake, it still has good rivalries and stories in WWE Raw, Smacksown, And ECW but TNa is boring and id rathre have a 4 sided ring instead of a 6 sided it makes it just more confusing. Also, WWE has many more tpyes of matches
PCE

2006-11-30 13:53:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

NO! WWE has been around longer but TNA wrestlers are better they have more wreslting and less Dumb to the Xtreme clips TNA will rule the wrestling world

2006-11-30 15:58:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well i say half and half because half of wwe is still good the only part good of wwe is smackdown because they got batista,undertaker,finlay,chris beniot,regal and cruiserweight action but raw no because its just dumb dramatic soap opera. and i say tna is better then wwe in excitment,action,better wrestlers but less air time, its really stupid for tna to air an hour show plus commercials take up the air time.

2006-11-30 16:27:41 · answer #5 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 0 0

yes because tna is trying to copy wwe and it is longer

2006-11-30 14:10:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes

2006-11-30 13:25:14 · answer #7 · answered by Matt: aka; Edge is world champ!! 6 · 2 0

in one word.. NO in wwe only looks matter and thats crap so im guessing TNA is better beacause they got skill

2006-11-30 14:00:43 · answer #8 · answered by # 1 edge head (Mr DEDEDE) 3 · 0 0

a million. AM raw = 2E/1C AM, effect = perfect time: the very actuality you would possibly want to carry close at that victory speaks of your delusions 2. TNA supplies you Hardcore: Hardcore became an element, an anomaly, a passing fad, It peaked quite somewhat 10 years in the past, enable it bypass 3. they "toddler their wrestler" : heaven forbid that once you note a risky style that you're taking steps to circumvent it, thinking the shape of persons in wrestling who did not see 50 because they entertained me as a baby, i pick them secure (even extra so even as information factors to in wring Head trauma being what brought about Benoit to kill his family contributors) 4. TNA is for Grown adult men: wrestling has traditionally been family contributors leisure, if "grown adult men" pick blood enable them employ talked about, in the adventure that they pick T&A there are those new recommendations, they are referred to as Pornography and the web, and evidently the ever customary Hybrid: internet Porn 5. get excitement from hall and Nash: I do, for what they did 12 years in the past, that does no longer advise that at 50 years previous and with extra injuries than i will count number they ought to no longer be headlining something 6. the "reliable previous days": genius, wrestling has been round lots longer than the ninety's in case you knew something about the product contained in the 80's you would realized that attitude/New international Order became the blip contained in the radar as I suggested in element #2 7. WWE tale strains no longer something to brag about: as hostile to Joe's Kidnapping, Orlando's body being against the law scene, Bubba the F'ok Sponge getting air time, Eric Bischoff doing the very similar 'edgy' BS that killed WCW (purely because AOL gave him an Alibi it doesn't make him possibility free) i might want to bypass on and on about the undesirable issues in TNA... by no ability do i pick 'predictable' yet when i imagine of four attainable concepts actually one of them should be 0.5 perfect, TNA books their shows like they have the family contributors guy Manatees from South Park on crew 8. and yet for all of your dissing of WWE, you shut with actually one of their trademark strains

2016-11-30 00:03:14 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes because wwe wrestlers r just stronger and better looking.

2006-11-30 13:29:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers