2006-11-30 12:15:22 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's a bit late to reinstate Saddam, but maybe now stupid Americans can understand why he was a successful ruler. As for him gassing Kurds....well DUH, they were his political enemies, and that's what dictators do: they destroy their opponents. I'd like to add that as many as 600,000 Iraqi civiilans have died in the present conflict, so what's worse? To be destroyed by your own government, or a foreign invader?
2006-11-30 12:28:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Saddam will never be back in power, he has decimated Iraq and all the surrounding areas!
2006-11-30 20:23:37 · answer #2 · answered by TRUE GRIT 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No and No. Iraq has splintered into fragments, and does not really exist as a country anymore.
There is no real central or even regional authority with which to plan, negotiate, fight or make peace with.
Saddam could not even survive in that chaos.
2006-11-30 20:21:32 · answer #3 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sadly Dumbya found a hell and made it hotter, not coinsidentally at the cost of $350 billion to the US taxpayer and for the vast profits of Halliburton et al.
2006-11-30 20:24:46 · answer #4 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is, and no, Saddam did not have order through means other than fear, and dictorial power.
2006-11-30 20:38:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah we can bring Sadaam if you want to control the population growing rate.
1. Either he'll kill them
2. Or else he'll make more using his sons' desires
2006-11-30 20:18:17 · answer #6 · answered by Thilina Guluwita 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ask 25 thousand Kurds if they want him back in power. No wait, they were all gassed to death...hmmmm.
2006-11-30 20:17:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
you know the reality don't you....as for Saddam ,he is going to hell soon....cheers
2006-11-30 20:26:22 · answer #8 · answered by CIVILIAN 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋