English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-30 12:15:18 · 14 answers · asked by buck80dj412 1 in Health Women's Health

14 answers

Depends if it was a full or partial hysterectomy. If only one ovary is removed then a natural pregancy can occur, if both ovaries are removed then an egg can be implanted but if ovaries and uterus are removed then no, no pregnancy can occur.

Hope this helps

2006-11-30 12:17:37 · answer #1 · answered by Katie G 3 · 2 0

I to find it particularly difficult to realize how she would have become pregnant without a uterus... I learn about ectopic/tual pregnancies, and there is no alternative but to terminate them as they are fatal for the youngster and mom long before the being pregnant reaches term. Now, excuse me being slightly graphic, but the section that confuses me is how the sperm reached the egg in the first position, with the uterus no longer there? Don't they go by means of the cervix, via the uterus, up a fallopian tube, and in finding the egg there? As she it appears has no uterus, a large part of that route is lacking... Without realizing her anatomy it's not feasible to assert, but sounds slightly odd to me... Having mentioned that, why would she lie??? Absolutely it's still bothering you although - might be you should talk to her. Be sensitive - if it is actual it could have been an awful expertise for her. Hi there, and i simply remembered reading once about a woman who had triplets - two within the uterus and one outside. Very very rare (and he or she did nonetheless have the uterus). The fertilised egg had long gone up the fallopian tube and out, and hooked up to the liver. Given that she used to be additionally pregnant the "typical" approach, the hormones etc had been all on monitor to help the pregnancy. Ethical to the story - weird things regularly can happen!!!

2016-08-09 23:58:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy after a total abdominal hysterectomy is rare and, for this reason, delay in diagnosis may occur when such a patient presents with abdominal pain. CASE: A multiparous patient with a history of cesarean hysterectomy 12 years before presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain and incidental positive urine beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). A computed tomography scan revealed a loculated left cystic mass in the pelvis. Laparotomy findings revealed a left adnexal mass; pathology revealed chorionic villi consistent with pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Ectopic pregnancy may occur after hysterectomy, but typically presents near the time of surgery and is more commonly associated with vaginal hysterectomy. However, because ectopic pregnancy is possible after hysterectomy, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of adnexal mass in such a patient.

PMID: 11975964 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

2006-11-30 12:18:46 · answer #3 · answered by Cesar G 3 · 0 0

i stumble on it particularly no longer common to understand how she would have become pregnant with no uterus... i understand approximately ectopic/tual pregnancies, and there is not any decision yet to terminate them as they are deadly for the baby and mom long until eventually now the being pregnant reaches term. Now, excuse me being somewhat picture, however the area that confuses me is how the sperm reached the egg in the 1st place, with the uterus no longer there? do no longer they bypass throughout the time of the cervix, throughout the time of the uterus, up a fallopian tube, and discover the egg there? As she curiously has no uterus, a extensive area of that course is lacking... without understanding her anatomy it is not achieveable to declare, yet sounds somewhat unusual to me... nonetheless, why would she lie??? for sure it continues to be bothering you however - consistent with hazard you're able to talk over along with her. Be mushy - no rely if it particularly is authentic it would have been an undesirable journey for her. whats up, and that i merely remembered reading as quickly as a pair of female who had triplets - 2 in the uterus and one exterior. Very very uncommon (and she or he did nonetheless have the uterus). The fertilised egg had long previous up the fallopian tube and out, and related to the liver. because of the fact she exchange into additionally pregnant the "normally happening" way, the hormones etc have been all on objective to assist the being pregnant. ethical to the story - strange issues in specific circumstances can take place!!!

2016-10-04 14:08:04 · answer #4 · answered by milak 4 · 0 0

There is no way that is possible. Do you know what a hysterectomy is? You cannot get pregnant without ovaries,uterus,ect.

2006-11-30 12:20:49 · answer #5 · answered by mojoethecat2003 1 · 0 0

I sure hope not! I had mine almost 3 years ago and no pregnancies for me since then. I do have only one ovary though. But I doubt it can happen.

2006-11-30 12:21:54 · answer #6 · answered by ♥just me♥ 5 · 0 0

total hysterectomy...i dont think it is possable considering the organs necessary for fertilization are removed.

2006-11-30 12:17:10 · answer #7 · answered by Jess 3 · 1 0

I don't know any, but I knew of a woman who had her tubes tied and ended up pregnant twice.

2006-11-30 12:16:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

its also not possible because they sew up the entry point to the uterus after they take it out so no sperm can get in anyway.

2006-11-30 12:19:25 · answer #9 · answered by george 2 6 · 0 0

if she did, she should sue the h*** out of her doc. they are supposed to remove your female (baby-making) organs in a hysterctomy.....that, being your uterus. You have to have a uterus to get pregnant & a baby to grow in.

2006-11-30 12:27:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers