I mean, from the point of view that he is now generating so much awareness of global warming.
2006-11-30 11:51:33 · 20 answers · asked by robbob 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i don't think he would have done anything about it if he got elected because of politics. maybe if he got a second term. but now hes out of politics and doesn't care what people think. i actually saw his global warming movie today. it was good.
2006-11-30 11:54:08 · answer #1 · answered by leena 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
But....Al Gore didn't lose the 2000 election. He beat Bushy in the popular vote and it was the damned electoral college which gave the election to the Crawford Clown. Had Gore been allowed to take his rightful place as President, we'd be doing something about global warming instead of being bogged down in a no-win war in Iraq. He would have sent the troops to Afghanistan where they belong, they would have captured bin Laden a long time ago and we could be taking care of the things which matter instead of wasting American lives in Iraq. But, thanks to that antiquated system known as the electoral college, we got stuck with Bush who is in the pocket of the major polluters and global warming is becoming more serious.
2006-11-30 20:34:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well how can a "good thing" be something that NEVER happened? (Gore lost???) Yes, despite the Dumbya Coup, Prez Gore has continued to contribute awareness about many various national and international issues, not the least of which you mention. Now just imagine how much good he would have done if he was allowed to serve in the office to which he was elected. It would be a vastly brighter, more hopeful, and more prosperous USA and world if the 1-20-01 Tragedy never happened. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2006-11-30 20:03:28 · answer #3 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
His lose was mute. Neither good nor bad .. for the country.
His views regards Global Warming are alarmist at best. The Earth is going thru a natural weather "swing" as it has for the better part of its existence. And I'm sure it will probably do it again, but not in our life-time. He is grand-standing to the hilt. Making the proverbial mountain from the mole hill. He'll also make tons of cash! I'm sure he'll laugh all the way to the bank.
Just like the scholars and scientisits that "warn" us about the impending volcanic explosion of Yellowstone that we can do nothing about .. save experience it.
2006-11-30 19:59:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he could have done better than that from the White House, including supporting the Kyoto Global Warming Treaty. And we would have the added bonus of not being an occupation force in Iraq and Afghanistan, making an unbelieveable mess out of both places, and Osama, Bush's family friend, might actually have been caught.
2006-11-30 19:52:51 · answer #5 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
He's a moron, and like all liberals thinks he's the center of the universe. The "global warming" scam is a money grab. We puny little bags of mostly water could no more make a long term affect on global climate than we could will the stars to stop shining.
Stop feeling and start thinking.
2006-11-30 19:56:21 · answer #6 · answered by ML 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
no it was bad that he lost the election, we are nowin volved in a war that we dont need, the president raises the gas price up and everyone hates us.I think al gore would have done better, Bush is more worrried about Iraq rather than his own people.
2006-11-30 19:56:32 · answer #7 · answered by jusmic80 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but not for your reason. Can anyone really envision Gore standing up to Islamofascist terrorists?
2006-11-30 20:21:23 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, he actually won the popular vote. It's a sin, since he
has compassion, academic & common sense.
If he would have won, I believe the economy today would be
in much better shape, not to mention, we would still have
all of our allies.
2006-11-30 19:54:52 · answer #9 · answered by Calee 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How many more kids do you want to die for a lie? No, Gore would not have sent our kids to die for Chaney's Halliburton and other oil companies.
2006-11-30 20:03:03 · answer #10 · answered by San Luis 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋