I would go with out food for 2 weeks. as much as I love my food *licks ice cream*
2006-11-30 11:41:10 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
uh, probably go with out. I see worm's as being fish bait and I have a pet tarantula, I could'nt think about eating one of my pets.
2006-11-30 12:18:51 · answer #1 · answered by Perfectly Insane 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Actually, everybody in the world already meets half of your requirement. In a single person's lifetime, they will swallow and eat 10 assorted spiders and insects. So I guess I'll only go without food for 1 week instead. Good question though.
2006-11-30 11:43:19 · answer #2 · answered by Chanele G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if you go without food for 2 weeks than your gonna have to digg up nasty worms and eat live disguting spiders that will eat your insides. So whats really the difference, though i wouldnt do either, becuz i would hide some where that they couldnt torture me to decide !!!!
2006-11-30 11:45:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Worms
2006-11-30 11:44:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A spider. a touch one. Worms are lengthy and slimy and that'd be fairly nasty. maximum individuals ingest spiders at the same time as slumbering besides. And there are, on consumer-friendly, 6 spider legs in each and every chocolate bar.
2016-10-08 00:53:52 · answer #5 · answered by jeudy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go without food
2006-11-30 11:44:33 · answer #6 · answered by fordperfect5 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go without food.
2006-11-30 12:49:43 · answer #7 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
eat 10 worms and eat 20 live big spider. at least i am brave
2006-11-30 12:33:43 · answer #8 · answered by rizwano 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would totaly go without food because aint no way I am eating any kind of bug
2006-11-30 12:05:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Without any food.
2006-11-30 11:44:23 · answer #10 · answered by Gabi Tobi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋