English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

The latest JD Power Dependability Survey ranks Land Rover a distant last. The news comes fresh on the heels of the recent Forbes Magazine report (using data from both JD Power and Consumer Reports) which ranked the LR3 and the latest 2006 Range Rover as the least reliable luxury vehicles sold in the US. All this will come as no surprise to the average Land Rover owner, and will no doubt be followed by the usual announcements from the factory about how they are improving radically.

In the dependability survey, J.D. Power questions owners of 3 year old vehicles about problems they are experiencing. Last-place Land Rover lagged far behind the second-to-last brand, Saab. Land Rover owners reported 438 problems per 100 vehicles, while Saab owners reported 326. Owners of top-rated Toyota vehicles reported only 136.

it's ok to buy a new LR with extended warranty, but don't bother yourself with a used one.

2006-11-30 10:53:39 · answer #1 · answered by coolant 1 · 0 0

If it change into provided as a Land Rover pick motor vehicle it would want to were precise repaired. As to a broking assure i do no longer understand what's on provide contained in the US. As to reliability the challenge is that those are intense tech ecu automobiles. they opt to be appeared after precise with broking element computer application.BMW's have the same challenge. you stay close to the broking. in case you get a street nook mechanic is the US to safeguard this they are going to make a multitude of it. you want to appreciate the motorized vehicle to safeguard it. they're reliable automobiles. contained in the US you've gas automobiles the position as the following in Europe extra are diesel powered. in case you purely like the motorized vehicle ask the broking to provide it a verify over and be conscious what their mechanics locate. Their mechanics contained in the united kingdom are nicely experienced and understand the automobiles nicely.

2016-11-28 02:31:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Most people I've talked to said they aren't good in terms of reliability and their parts are expensive.

Consumer reports rates them below average in reliability.

You can look them up and see what MSN says about the reliability of your year here:
http://autos.msn.com/home/reliability_ratings.aspx

2006-11-30 10:46:27 · answer #3 · answered by hsueh010 7 · 0 0

No, they're not. You'd be the "un" luckiest guy, and you'd be out of a lot of money. Expensive and definitely not worth it. Check Consumer Reports Auto issue...you'll see.

2006-11-30 10:50:35 · answer #4 · answered by vamedic4 5 · 0 0

if its old dont go there.

2006-11-30 10:50:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers