I would go with Leinart. Vick is a very good player but doesn't do the normal quarterback things that get you points in fantasy as well as Leinart.
2006-11-30 09:44:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by msi_cord 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd pick Vick. Even though they are a running team, Vick included, Redskins just have a bad defense, good talent, but give up way too many yards and even touchdowns. Of course he's having a cold streak, I just wouldnt trust Leinart b/c of his offensive line. Rams aren't too bad at defending the pass, top 10 in pass defense I believe. Redskins also have a bad run stopping team. The Falcons WR's are motivated more than ever after last weeks disappointment. And you know Vick is going to throw it to Crumpler.
2006-11-30 17:45:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by VP 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Leinart
2006-11-30 17:45:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by c00kies 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Leinart.
2006-11-30 18:06:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jazzy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vick
2006-11-30 18:56:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by chrstnwrtr 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd go with Vick just because he's wanting to show how good he is and prove himself after last weeks incident and... the redskins have a terrible defense.
2006-11-30 18:50:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Brensgrl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know vicks receivers are horriblebut the redskins pass defense is that much worse. Do't look for crumpler and lelie to have 2 bad games.the redskins d is ranked 30 in the league.
2006-11-30 17:43:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by beast 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definetly start Vick he will come out and appoligize for what he did by playing a really good game im telling you man start Vick.
2006-11-30 18:14:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by shashank g 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vick. Cause he is ready to redeem himself this week. Plus the Cards Defense is ranked i think 29th or 30th and they wont be able to contain Vick he should end up with a TD or two!!
2006-11-30 18:11:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Who Dat Chic!! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vick because he had 150-some odd yards against the Saints. Even though he might not even play.
2006-11-30 17:59:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by RRE 2
·
0⤊
0⤋