Do you think it is a good idea to stay and divide the country and make shares for each of the Iraq citizens with the oil revenue?
Or do you think USA should get out and let them decide how they want to divide the country or not and what to do?
I was just curious what people thought? Not taking sides just asking. So don't get hostile.
2006-11-30 06:07:27 · 6 answers · asked by Steven 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush and his cronies should come to the final decision that it is best to get out of Iraq. Each day we remain there only makes the situation worse. Unfortunately Bush does not seem to realize this. I'm not saying to bring them all home at once. What I am saying is to bring them home gradually, maybe even 500 at a time. We're not wanted there. We already have enough enemies. Bush should forget about Iraq's oil because the entire Middle East now knows that oil was our primary reason for invading Iraq. They only see themselves as next. GET OUT BUSH.
2006-11-30 06:34:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ramp up the effort and turn the heat to high. Stick it out till a satisfactory conclusion is reached and leave a force behind to cover things as we have all over the world.
2006-11-30 14:19:34 · answer #2 · answered by Rich B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think US prestige among other things is on the line. The Iraqis have to decide their own fate but we should stay and give them the support they need.
2006-11-30 14:17:11 · answer #3 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stay the course was a phrase the young boys father use to say, and he thinks it makes him sound "Presidential" In his case it translates to "keep doin what we're doin, and keep the money rolling in for daddy's friends, and me and mine will never have to worry financially. Daddy promised." Wake up America!!! You have been Bamboozled.
2006-11-30 14:18:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Apparently not...Tony Snow announced that 'stay the course' would no longer be a term used by the administration. They then changed it to 'adapt to win' which is the republican version of 'cut and run' (Rumsfeld)
2006-11-30 14:15:41 · answer #5 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Its been about 8 yrs now, we went from having a surplus to a large deficit, that speaks for itself
2006-11-30 14:12:19 · answer #6 · answered by AD 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋