evolution vs creationism in the science classroom in the UK?

Question

My opinion is that if something is to be taught in the science classroom it needs to be supported and questioned by evidence.
evolution was devised and is constantly revised by evidence where as creationism has never been supported by any evidence, it has only ever been held up by a book that was written and added to when most people couldn't even read or write let alone question it without the fear of persecution.
How can we expect future generations to further their knowledge and technologies when we have people who have a narrow minded view of which they will not accept can be questioned or proven wrong.
Religion can be used for so many very good causes, but for it to be used to restrict advances is surely against its own tenents.

Answer 1

Creationism is not science and can never be science. A fundamental point of anything scientific is that it is constantly being revised every time a new fact appears. That is the way evolution works. Millions of new facts have appeared since the 1800s and all of them have been able to easily fit into a theory that is flexible and predictive.

One of the characteristics of science is that it has falsifiability - that is, you have to explain what proof you would accept that your theory is wrong. Evolution would be wrong if there was any meaningful evidence that the Earth was only a few thousand years old. Evolution would be wrong if there was no evidence that animals are related to each other. But despite desperate searching, the anti-evolutionists have not come up with any evidence for either of these points.

On the other hand, the creationist guys refuse to explain what evidence they would accept that creationism is wrong. That alone means that they cannot be regarded as scientific and that alone makes their viewpoint a religious one which ought to be excluded from science classrooms. That is the legal position in the USA, confirmed over and over by many courts - most recently last summer when a very conservative judge appointed by President Bush threw out a case where some Pennsylvania religious fanatics were trying to get creationism taught in school. The judge gave them a tongue lashing and told them to stop wasting the court's time!

Answer 2

I easily have studied evolution in intensity and mutually as there is documents for micro-evolution there is extremely little for macro-evolution, the undertaking is the time era wherein evolution from one species to a diverse might ensue, we've not lived lengthy sufficient to artwork out it extremely ensue. As for the fossil record it does not extremely coach some thing diverse than the reality that there have been diverse variations of specific creatures in the time of time, a remarkable style of which regardless of the reality that exist right now from hundreds of thousands of years interior the previous. As for meant lacking links to people those would desire to in in the present day forward words as extremely be variations of human species very such as we see right now, we dont anticipate pygmies have progressed into Masai warriors will we. mutually as none of this disproves evolution it in basic terms factors out that we would desire to constantly save an open suggestions. Now no count if evolution did ensue and the 1st in the present day forward cellular formed from inanimate count type type it regardless of the reality that doesnt make sparkling the policies of physics that have been in place to permit this to ensue, the policies that have been created on the tremendous bang, the 'programming' that set all of this in action, that ought to in no way be defined yet to me it shows there is intelligence interior the back of all of it, we'd in no way understand what that intelligence is in our lifetime regardless of the shown actuality that it would easily make sparkling all the only million-in-a-gazillion danger occurrences that have extra concerning the remarkable beings we are with our unique information optimum to all the marvellous debates we've over its origins (thoroughly on Y/A it style of feels!)

Answer 3

Look at the flip side. Evolution must be revised and rethought every month or so because they find something to make them realize that they didn't have it quite right to begin with. A theory that faces so many constant changes is in too big a state of flux to be taught as a legitimate fact. Creation's facts have not changed for 6000 years. Your's change daily.

Answer 4

I like to use creationism for the creation of the big bang, after that our science as we know it works well with the evidence we have.