When the truth is that there is nothing about being a "godless liberal" or having a secular democracy which is incompatible with the basic political values of America: individual rights, religious liberty, and personal autonomy.
2006-11-30 05:51:37 · 9 answers · asked by JS 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Its obviously an appeal to the conservative religious right to say that if you don't believe in God, you must be an immoral person at heart.
The ironic thing is that we all could name dozens of religious figures who have been anything but moral in their actions.
2006-11-30 06:09:46 · answer #1 · answered by thehiddenangle 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It isn't meaningless. These days, it sometimes seems redundant. There is nothing un American about being secular. There is something un American about trying to force everyone else to be secular.
The fact that being a Godless liberal isn't un American doesn't make the expression meaningless.
2006-11-30 13:55:40 · answer #2 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes I am a Liberal and a devout believer in Christ. And if You were to listen to the teachings of Christ you would find that in todays light Ann Coultier would hate him too.
2006-11-30 13:58:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Meaningless...... Hmmmm, Id say that going by all that Liberals support, or what they dont, Id say that godless is an accurate call!
2006-11-30 13:57:35 · answer #4 · answered by Bob 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don't know why the conservatives use the term "godless liberals". The smug way most of them act, they don't seem to care about truly honoring God. So I don't know why they bring God into it.
2006-11-30 13:54:59 · answer #5 · answered by brian2412 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
that's a phrase that only comes out the mouth of a right-wing idiot...if you hear it, just change the channel because you're not listening to anything remotely intellectual.
2006-11-30 13:58:08 · answer #6 · answered by Pete Schwetty 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's nonsense. Just another tool to try to divide people over issues of personal preference.
2006-11-30 13:56:21 · answer #7 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Actually, it's a redundancy.
2006-11-30 14:06:34 · answer #8 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes,meaningless.
Good question full of truth.Thumbs up!
2006-11-30 14:02:36 · answer #9 · answered by cannon Ball! 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋