Some people think that 9/11 was planned by the US Government. It's a conspiracy theory.
2006-11-30 04:04:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Faux News 3
·
4⤊
6⤋
I've seen the same sites including the videos footage on google and youtube. It seems that if the 3rd building 7 (47-stories) of the world trade center which collapsed in free-fall speed (without being hit by an airplane) was intentional by means of controlled demolition (clean tactical methods of pulling down large buildings without affecting neighboring structures), then this idea opens a can of worms to all other possibilities.
The official reports may say how the other buildings collapsed but just about everyone especially with well-educated engineers will tell you that an airplane could not collapse a 100-story building in free-fall speed. Is it possible that these buildings were also part of a controlled demolition?
If you believe that, then this could lead to further questions as to why someone or some well organized groups would allow this to these buildings. The same way smart and/or immoral people (depending on your view) can avoid paying high fees to repair a large dent on their car from a minor accident can easily plan a major accident and totally reck their car to collect full insurance benefits (assuming there was coverage) to buy a new car. These insurance scams happen frequently and could possibly be applied to the 9/11 event.
And if you still believe that and also consider collecting multi-billion dollars from insurance is worth more than the loss of a few thousands lives with billions of dollars in building repair expenses, then now you would need to believe that an inside job would have been orchestrated. And at this scale, only people or groups with authority, influence, and wealth would have the ability to pull it off. This "inside job" would also require contingency plans to ensure and persuade that you could never believe such orchestration ever took place and distract or ridicule you for even thinking that. If you resist , then you too would say 9/11 was an inside job.
2006-12-02 05:35:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by John D 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
It means you've logged onto a site created by people who have a conclusion and look for evidence to prove it, not the other way around.
Either that, or one created by people who don't think through the absurdity of their claims.
Example:
"they used that building [WTC 7] for guiding the planes to the target."
Guiding the planes? How hard is it to fly a plane into the tallest building the city? It doesn't require a mission control room or anything. You just point the plane at the building, sit back, and let physics take care of the rest.
Even assuming that they used some sort of ridiculous remote control plane (a much more risky plan than just getting someone to fly a plane into a building), they wouldn't put the mission control center next to the target. They'd do it from some Air Force Base or underground bunker, not a building that would stand a chance of getting crushed by a falling tower. Even if you could account for that, seeing all the people jumping from windows next door would be bad for your accomplices' morale.
It's amazing how people try so hard to convince themselves that something, anything, other than what happened happened.
2006-11-30 20:42:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jeff S. 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, starting at the beginning, PNAC http://www.newamericancentury.org the Project for the New American Century is a Washington-based think tank created in 1997. According to a White Paper produced in September of 2000 entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century," they want the United States, by way of economic and military force, to bring the rest of the world under the umbrella of a new socio-economic Pax Americana. The New World Order.
A quote from that white paper states, "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.” Coincidentally, exactly one year later, 9-11 occurred.
The founding members of PNAC now sit in the TOP seats of our government. Vice President Dick Cheney is a founding member of PNAC, along with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Defense Policy Board chairman Richard Perle. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz is the ideological father of the group. Bruce Jackson, a PNAC director, served as a Pentagon official for Ronald Reagan before leaving government service to take a leading position with the weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin. William Kristol, famed conservative writer for the Weekly Standard, is also a co-founder of the group. The Weekly Standard is owned by Ruppert Murdoch, who also owns international media giant Fox News.
When Bush assumed the Presidency, the men who created and nurtured the world domination schemes of PNAC became the men who run the Pentagon, the Defense Department and the White House. On September 11th, when the Towers came down, these men saw their chance to turn their White Papers into substantive policy. On September 20th 2001, Bush released the "National Security Strategy of the United States of America." It is an ideological match to PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report issued a year earlier.
MOST of the pictorial and video evidence DOES NOT support the government's official story of the events of 9-11. The MULTITUDE of seeming coincidences also further weaken that "official" story.
While there are a lot of hokey "conspiracy" sites out there, it's not difficult for any intelligent person to sift through and gain the obvious facts. The facts alone damn the official story. Whatever happened that day, and whoever perpetrated it, one thing is clear: the "official" story is wrong. Dead wrong.
And now we have the very founders of PNAC and it's world-domination dreams occupying the top seats of our government, breaking our laws, acting unconstitutionally, changing our Constitution to absolve themselves, changing the power balance of the 3 branches of our government, and severly reducing the rights and protections of our citizens...while claiming that is the very thing terrorists seek to do. Our own government beat them to it.
Our government has been taken over by PNAC in a very quiet, yet very public, coup.
2006-11-30 05:03:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by tat2me1960 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
You need to watch loose change, its available to download for free all over the internet. It puts forward some very strong questions that need to be answered but have not been.
inside job refers to the US govt inflicting 9/11 upon themselves so they could go on a rampage and make lots of money. Not just oil money US top brass all have links to defence companies and construction industry an obviously oil, just so happens to be the three industries that have benefited most.
Watch the film please
2006-12-01 00:34:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it means that the US govt not only knew about it, but planned and executed it as well.
there are many facts about the case that point to this. certainly i think it is the case. i also believe that bin laden is a fall guy by design of both him and the US govt. the point to 911 was to create a situation of 'terror' amoungst the home population to enable agendas to be executed (iraq for example, or more explicitly the imposing of 'democracy' in the middle east, and increased military spending generally) as well as pass laws that infringe personal privacy and freedoms with the full support of the public because they are led to believe it is for their security against 'terror'. (great example for democracy!)
watch this space for another 911 or 7/7 in the next year or so.... certainly there is a build up... how many 'bomb plots' uncovered these last 6mths? when before 6mths ago there where few if any.
2006-11-30 04:14:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by sofiarose 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
It means it is believed that there was collusion and misinformation and that the USA authorities knew it was going to happen and took no appropriate action.
It is claimed that Mosad knew and informed the USA authorities one week before and made sure no or few Israelis were at the Trade Centre that day.
It is claimed (I do not believe it) that it was allowed to happen to give Bush the reason to attack Iraq & Afganistan.
2006-11-30 04:15:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by ian d 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
There's some evidence that the building shouldn't have collapsed,even under such an attack, so the structure of the building must have been tampered with for the supports to give way.
There's a hell of a lot of dodginess going on in USA government bodies. We'll never know the truth about 9/11, JFK, moon landing etc. All the usual conspiracy theory stuff.
2006-11-30 04:06:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Queen of the Stone Age 3
·
6⤊
4⤋
Have you noticed how the true believers has only one crutch to lean on? The words "Conspiracy Theory". 9/11 was 100% inside job.
2006-11-30 04:24:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by lghs 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Well I've heard that a couple of times about the london bombings too, it's just because both the attacks came at rather handy times for the government, it was at a time when the politicians were trying to defend their reasons for going to war when the public was against it.
I don't know if it's true or not, but I don't think we can cancel out either idea.
2006-11-30 04:09:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by floppity 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
It means that Muslims all over the world are trying to deflect their guilt and fix their P.R problem by blaming everyone else for 9/11.
2006-12-01 03:57:23
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋