2006-11-30 03:54:53 · 6 answers · asked by lion4roaring 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
not at all feasible burden to the common man loss to exchequer.leads to political instability .traders will purchase mla s like horses.development wiill be stagnented.ultimately it leads fpr autocracy of delhi rulers not all suggestable
2006-11-30 19:31:41 · answer #1 · answered by roaringlion 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmm... I'll not say smaller states are feasible, but yes, they do make it easy for governance because there are lesser people and there is less area to manage..
On the other hand, having many small states makes administration very difficult for the country as a whole.
For example: Trade, it becomes difficult and expensive for feasible trade to exist between states( if there are too many).
2006-11-30 04:16:44 · answer #2 · answered by Vinay 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No doubt smaller states are feasible for rule,but such things are being done for getting votes and creating posts to adjust near and dears.Sometimes such things are done to gain political benefits.
2006-11-30 04:01:20 · answer #3 · answered by suchsi 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
s
2006-11-30 04:06:05 · answer #4 · answered by afk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IT IS MADE FOR INTEREST OF SOME PEOPLE.
2006-11-30 14:29:16 · answer #5 · answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes must be...!!!
2006-11-30 16:02:07 · answer #6 · answered by srinivasan s 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋