Please answer the following questions. Use complete sentences:
Explain two ways technology is used in the field of genetics. (4 pts)
Justify when you think it is and/or is not appropriate to conduct genetic testing to solve a crime. Describe at least one situation. (4 pts)
Do you think DNA evidence is enough to convict a person of a crime? Give two reasons to support your opinion. (7 pts)
2006-11-30 02:56:54 · 2 answers · asked by ♫ Think happy thoughts ♪ 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Technology is used in the field of genetics in that it is used to determine the DNA of someone and it is used to retrive the data on the databank of DNA.
It is always appropirate to conduct genetic testing to solve a crime. Using any available resources to end crime has no downfalls. A situation where it would be appropriate would be a rape case where there was DNA retreived from teh victim and matched the the perp
DNA evidence is enough evidence to convict a person of a crime. One reason is that DNA does not lie. ANother reason is that everything else, including eye witness testimony, is influenced by outside factors.
2006-12-03 07:32:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
whilst the suspect is your self or somebody close to to you. Or in case you have sturdy thoughts or ideals which will impression your judgdement and stop you from making honest and independent judgements. Then it would be unethical or perhaps in keeping with possibility unlawful on account which you would be seen as bias and prejudicial. to boot that, no one is above the regulation. If the info proves previous a life like doubt that he/she had dedicated stated crime, then he/she would desire to be stunning punished.
2016-12-17 18:53:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋