No, but I think they have found a niche market for sounding pompous and having their heads stuck firmly inside their skull so that their brains are suffocating..
2006-11-30 01:42:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Christine H 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe art critics are over-wrought trying to find something NEW. Something that defines our modern culture. That would make someone sick in the head.
2006-11-30 00:58:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by joyfulpaints 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think gilbert and george and the chapman brothers are genuises, tracy emin and damien hirst are just johnny come lately 5th rate shock artists. i have made an obscene amount of money on the current modern art scene and most of it is crap that looks like it was painted by a chimp draggin its as's over a canvas.
2006-11-30 00:37:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
you may well be correct (ie) when i walked into the tate modern all i could see was a pile of polystyrene bricks ina pose of being art it was so big i could never have that in my house but i also see a lot of works i had done many years ago and i am not a artist and i slapped the bugger on the wall and called it decorating also cheesh on toast
2006-11-30 03:41:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by debandmole 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
well most serious artists, well main stream anyways are definitely sick in the head so people feeding off them, yer probably!
2006-11-30 00:26:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by drow 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are total nut jobs with too much money to spend on crap !
2006-11-30 00:31:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by londonlee33 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not.
They are ALL sick between their legs.
2006-11-30 00:55:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by longboy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
pretty much so and also easily conned
2006-11-30 00:31:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes i do too
2006-11-30 00:31:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by lola 5
·
0⤊
0⤋