President Bush rejects the notion that there is a civil war going on in Iraq.?

Question

Can he reject the notion that the sun comes up in the east? Captain Smith of the Titanic stood the course. Where is he now? That iceberg dead ahead has an oil rig on it.

CNN? How about Fox (faux) News. Evern they say there is a civil war in Iraq.

Answer 1

Actually, Captain Smith DIDN'T stay the course. He tried to alter it, which caused the iceberg to rip the side of the ship open. If he would have went strait into it, most of the people would have lived...

...But I know what you mean.

Yes, the President has been somewhat stubborn about Iraq. The President, as a leader, needs to do what he feels is best for his country, but he must also obey those who he represents. If most (it seems nearly all) of the people believe that Iraq is messed up in one way or another, then he needs to fix it.

Obviously, a LOT of people want him to start a phased withdrawal of the troops. This would probably be best, but if the President were willing to do ANYTHING, anything at all to edit how things are going in Iraq, he would have received more respect than he does now (the Pol. & Gov. section of Answers shows how little he gets.)

You can't just go into a country and stick to the plan. War requires movement, changes, positioning, and occasionally, new views. The President has been using the same play book for the last 4+ years, and it's not working anymore; the other team knows the plays. You've got to change things to win, and sadly to say, I don't believe that the President has taken Iraq seriously enough.

He needs to do something. Correction, he NEEDED to do something. It's too late now. The President has lost all hope of gaining support from the people, due to his failure to change. "Stay The Course" has killed our "War On Terror". The Iraqi Civil War has begun, and we're sitting in there, trying to help one side win. There was another war like this a while back, and it started with a "V".

Answer 2

Its now official, that there is a civil war. As of this week, all major News agencies are permitted to use the C word on Iraq. Actually, the civil war in Iraq began well before President Bush announced mission accomplished aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln on May 1, 2003 .

The only problem is that the Bush administration could not accept the 'so-called free' press to announce civil war, because it would imply that the invasion of Iraq created a civil war in that region.

Since the Bush administration lost the recent election, so there is no way to 'contain' the lie, so to speak. If the Republican Party had won this election, Iraq would still be on a 'brink' of a Civil War or insurgents causing division.

Answer 3

Wrong again Sparky.

Their's a fanatical Muslim insurgency operating in Iraq and they are battling with the al Sadr people. The Kurds aren't involved and most of the normal citizens are not involved so it appears that you are the one who's WRONG. Oh, and by the way, even the ultra liberal CNN hasn't said there's a civil war and neither has Fox News. That was NBC who said that dummy.

You guys just can't go making this crap up and thinking that people are going to believe it. there's those of us out here who will expose liars every time we find one. Like the Caveman says, next time, do a little research.

Answer 4

Oh the standard solutions. definite, Obama is president now, yet they by no potential criticised Bush returned then, did they? in fact, each physique knew it replaced right into a lie, and yet he had a number of his optimal help for invading Iraq. Phoenix even says that Bush did no longer lie approximately Iraq because of the fact they got here upon bio-weapons labs, properly, duh, the US were monitoring those labs because of the fact the 1st gulf war had ended, Hans Blix replaced into going into those places to make constructive they weren't in use, and that they've been, er, no longer in use. Having labs does no longer mean they have been getting used. As for locating mustard and serin gasoline, they for sure did no longer discover adequate for it to be seen a threat to Israel, because of the fact the record says that no WMDs have been ever got here upon, or maybe ever existed in Iraq on the time. close to claims that's being misinformed. If setting up your intelligence employer to deliberatly "mislead" you a pair of specific concern and permit you be responsive to what you go with to pay attention isn't mendacity, then i think of i'm onto a winner right here. the topic right that's that proper wingers choose to believe what they choose to pay attention. they in basic terms get their information from specific components, the terrific wing press, so that they are no longer technically mendacity right here, they're in basic terms taking part in ignorant by making use of ignoring all the proper information available. i think that's what they call irony.

Answer 5

YEA !
Terrorists killing terrorists , financed by Iran , trained by Hezbullah.
You're right about the oil but it's Iran that wants to control it , thru their proxies .
Give Iran political control of Iraq and Lebanon , they have the oil and the deep water ports .
Can you spell , STRANGLEHOLD on the worlds oil supply .
Next , Iran goes after Saudi Arabia and the smaller Gulf states to completely control the middle east .
Go ahead pull out an Atlas , Check it out .

Answer 6

Not really . No one in Iraq wants a civil war. its is basically a family squabble among those who have secterian Islamic beliefs . It has happened in the past and the present is nothing new.There may be a problem if Sadam is excecuted.May be they may find it better if they dont.

Answer 7

When two groups of citizens in the same country who hold seperate and oppositional political viewpoints reject the standing government and take up arms against each other, isn't that the definition of civil war? Or did I sleep through Civics class? Or Did W?

Answer 8

He hopes and prays for a miracle that will save his reputation in posterity. Denial of reality is the only option he has. If things don't spontaneously "go right" in Iraq, he will be remembered forever as the chimp that he is. I think he'd rather pray for that miracle than ever admit he was wrong or made a mistake, or should be held responsible for the deaths of 600,000 Iraqiis and over 2000 American sons and daughters.

Answer 9

I think if a person of such obviously low I.Q. as Bush says there isn't a civil war happening in Iraq then it would be safe to say the there is a civil war happening in Iraq.

Answer 10

Why do you think that he rejects this idea. I am quite sure that he does not. I believe that you have just fabricated a fact to show yourself a Bush hater. If you are going to lie at least try to make about something that we cant see right through.