Wow pretty cool Bond that Daniel Craig. Surely better than that cheesy Brosnan chap. Good to see less bullshit and more grit
2006-11-29 23:34:10 · 12 answers · asked by dennis 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
No. If I want more "grit", I'll watch the Bourne Identity / Supremacy. I expect a certain standard of uber-coolness from my James, and Daniel just looks like a bouncer in that tux, not a millionaire play-boy / superspy. He can't fight for toffee (it might be his first 007 mission, but he will have had bucket-loads of training).
If he's supposed to be the Service's best poker player, how could he fall for the oh-so-obvious fake tell? I spotted that one a mile off! And much as I love Dame Judi as M, if this is 007's first mission, how can she be M? She was specifically introduced as a replacement in Goldeneye! Whole lines of script centred around it!
Plus, Daniel is not gorgeously handsome. When he walked out the water, all I could think was "His head's too small, and his ears stick out".
Poor, poor, poor - even makes OHMSS look good...
2006-11-29 23:45:21 · answer #1 · answered by cuddles_gb 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Having just seen the film, I think Daniel Craig does make a good Bond. I think it won't be until the next film where he'll really settle in to the role though. I did, however, think the plot was a bit fractured and a little confusing. Who was the real 'bad guy'? Bond villains ought to be lusting for something like world domination, not a relatively 'measly' £100 million! The lack of Q and his gadgets was also disappointing, in my view. A good Bond film needs a fantastic car chase which was lacking in Casino Royale.
The opening title was amazing. Being a designer myself, I loved the mixture of animation and film while the credits were rolling. The 'chase' scene at the beginning was fantastic. Good film on the whole...
2006-11-29 23:57:26 · answer #2 · answered by Fragile Rock 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Awesome film!
All the criticism about casting a blonde Bond was a complete load of rubbish. Daniel Craig was brilliant
2006-11-29 23:37:51 · answer #3 · answered by Dan-yul 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I liked Brosnan, but I couldn't stand that last movie, where a giant space laser was chasing him around the ice cap. That was pure cheese. So when this movie started off with Craig smashing a guy's head into a urinal in a dirty public bathroom, I knew we were off to a promising start.
2006-11-29 23:39:00 · answer #4 · answered by truth be told 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As replaced into stated by using the two earlier respondents James Bond replaced into being hit in his inner maximum section by using a heavy knotted rope, persistently. he's likewise hit in different spots additionally, then Le Chiffre concepts the chair over to eliminate James Bond's male organ.
2016-10-13 10:24:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I loved the movie....I like the new direction they are taking....this one was more believable and I liked how Bond used his muscles instead of fancy gadgets to get the bad guys (remember the invisible car in Die Another Day---PLEASE!!).....hopefully they continue with the next movie.....Daniel did a great job not to mention looking HOT in his swimsuit....meow!
2006-11-30 00:43:33 · answer #6 · answered by Penguin Gal 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
what a welcome change to cardboard brosnan! Daniel craig is the HOTTEST bond ever! great action, great swim suit scenes and most of all the best hunk of man meat i have ever seen!
2006-11-29 23:38:38 · answer #7 · answered by mirren 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I LOVED this movie best bond movie of the lot and it was totally pc too. the only bond that was in any way gritty and hard was timothy dalton.
2006-11-29 23:44:20 · answer #8 · answered by Mother of Tae Kwon Do 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2006-11-29 23:35:57 · answer #9 · answered by hello772345 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah!! i think it was worth watchin in da cinema..the movies gna do well at the box office... definetly!
2006-11-29 23:37:05 · answer #10 · answered by Paki~Princess 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋