English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the prime minister,seems to represent the west in Iraq ,and bush ,in Iraq,so with the situation getting worse every day ,and bush requesting so much from the iraq prime minister,,,just what would happen to bush,s plans in Iraq if the prime western minister was,killed ?

2006-11-29 22:57:45 · 9 answers · asked by CIVILIAN 4 in Politics & Government Politics

epbr,,,with the current level of death in iraq,,it would be completly insane to try to leagaly elect a new western leader there,,only more death would result,,so i think ,all hope for the :BUSH: plan rest on this current puppet leader...cheers

2006-11-29 23:04:25 · update #1

9 answers

STILL?!?!??! BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Wake up. Iraq is lost. It's only a question of when we're outta there and how many more lives will be lost on Bush's watch.

But to answer your Q more precisely, if Malaki were assasignated, it would merely speed the country's descent into complete chaos, where it's headed anyway.

Guess we're not subscribing to a "you-break-you-buy" philosophy over there. How 'bout, "you-break-then-bail"?

2006-11-29 23:00:14 · answer #1 · answered by 40oz2freedom 2 · 1 1

President Bush does not run the Iraq government or Iraqi politics. The premise of your question is wrong. If anything, it appears that Malaki is listening too much to Mucktada al Sadr, the radical Shiite cleric.
Malaki is, am sure, trying to do what is right for all of Iraq. So is President Bush.
Just remember, when it comes to politics, everyone has an opinion.
If Mr. Malaki were killed, his party would name his replacement.

2006-11-29 23:03:28 · answer #2 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1 0

you've misstated the information - such as the evening community information. Par for the direction for the Obamedia. Al Maliki made a passing connection with Obama's unique idea countless months in the past in an interview with a German mag. It became no longer a call for and it became no longer directed at BUSH. Obama has in view that moved on to a special plan - and then decrease back to 16 months - and then on to a special plan - and then decrease back to 16 months - and then... Oh, hell! no one knows WHAT Obama's plan is. DO YOU? Does Obama? Obama is immediately making himself inappropriate. there is an election marketing campaign happening in Iraq. Al Maliki is declaring fairly some stuff. he's no longer as undesirable as Obama bt take it for what that's properly worth. marketing campaign communicate.

2016-11-29 23:22:29 · answer #3 · answered by rieck 4 · 0 0

The war in Iraq was a mistake simply because Muslims will always roll back to the Islamic doctrine and that doctrine is far from democratic. We are living in an era of Islamic take over and the problem is that we sit back and democratically watch this religious mess.

2006-11-29 23:07:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He does not have control politically, there is a civil war there, he has half control at best of a puppet who stood him up! So maybe he just as a wayning influence?

2006-11-29 23:22:56 · answer #5 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0 0

Right now it would not make much difference because nobody has control of Iraq. It has spun out of control.

2006-11-29 23:00:12 · answer #6 · answered by JUAN FRAN$$$ 7 · 1 0

a new western prime minister would be elected

2006-11-29 22:59:55 · answer #7 · answered by epbr123 5 · 1 1

No, It dose not make much different, the PM is not in control any how.

2006-11-29 23:01:14 · answer #8 · answered by yousef 1 · 1 0

You do not know what you are talking about.

2006-11-29 23:30:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers