I am only 13 yrs old but i have a theory...
Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong ago there was a HUGE giant ball of extremely hot gas (a very powerful star, with more energy than anything existing now...) that was constantly losing energy (like how everything is). One day it had much too little energy to contain it's size that it exploded (The BIG BANG). Little bits of the star was scattered around space, the hotter pieces with more energy caused stars. The smaller pieces with less energy caused planets. Because these stars and planets had equal force pulling inwards from the middle of them they formed a rounded sphere shape. And this is how planets and stars were formed.....phew! I asked my science teacher but he didn't know.
2006-11-29 21:53:50 · 7 answers · asked by ♥Killing Loneliness♥ 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
your science teacher aint a science teacher then, cos that is what i was taught
2006-11-29 21:55:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Firstly, I would like to say that your theory is as good as any other theory ( I think its a good thing to make up your own theory, only to discover that it already exist). To be honest I do not know. Like all creation and Big Bang theories it lacks an answer to a simple question. Who created the creator. In this case what created the giant ball and where has all this energy come from to begin with.
It has been argued it created itself or that space imploded and then it created the universe. That answer formulates a statement being "there was nothing and then it was everywhere" therefore creating itself is not a valid statement as the presence of things is contrary to the nothing.
I think this theory should focus on the creation of planets and stars but I am afraid that there is a logical problem. If the universe is infinite in nature then it is not expanding. If there is one ball then it cannot be expanding at all, which is contrary to many beliefs. This logically means that the universe is finite in nature.
To be honest I do not have a clear answer and if I did I certainly would not share it here. I think if this is your own theory and later discovered it to be a shared opinion. I think that it shows a certain brilliance on your part. Even if I am wrong and merely a subconcious adoption then so be it.
To be blunt it makes as much sense as any other theory. (yes I am treating it seperate from the general big bang theory for my reasons that the reader can logically deduce above). I hope that despite any critisms here that you make further enquiries.
2006-11-30 07:07:08 · answer #2 · answered by tissapharnes 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you 13 or 23???
2006-11-30 05:57:25 · answer #3 · answered by sum1 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
okay, it's just a theory..
you can't tell if that theory is the real one that happened a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnggggggggggggggggggggggg ttttttttttttttttttiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimmmmmmmmmmmmmeeeeeeeeeeeee aaaaaaaaggggggggggggggoooooooooooo..
just stick to the theories..it's worth believing..Ã
2006-11-30 05:57:52 · answer #4 · answered by angelvein 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YOu are a regular Steven Hawking.
2006-11-30 05:56:50 · answer #5 · answered by sshazzam 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that's actually how the big bang started
2006-11-30 05:56:57 · answer #6 · answered by epbr123 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stop it. You're talking crazy. ;)
2006-11-30 05:56:23 · answer #7 · answered by hallowlulu 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋