Why has Britney not been arrested for exposing her genitalia several times with taped evidence to prove it?
The average person would be jailed, fined and have a record. Are the rich and famous just better than everyone else?
2006-11-29 21:25:31 · 10 answers · asked by StarDuster 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Brittany, Paris, Lindsay and the like are all poor examples of human beings. They are well overpaid, have medicaore talent and Paris hasnone. They give little to charity if any, spend lavishly on themselves and give nothing back to society. There should be a backlash against such people. and I wish everyone would not pa attention to them.
2006-11-29 23:31:28 · answer #1 · answered by 79vette 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm really glad you are now discovering this. Celebrities are a different group of people then the average person on the street. Just like the old saying goes. Money talks and BS walks. Money is what rules this world we live in now and has been sense Bush took office. The gap between the "haves" and "have not's" isn't even in the same city anymore. It doesn't matter where a celebrity came from, when the money and power begins, their thinking suddenly changes too. It's sad really to see what could have been a super person change simply because they were lucky enough to be born attractive.
2006-11-29 21:57:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
It could also be a ploy to promote her "bad girl" image ahead of her "comeback". Not that she's out there posing for those shots on purpose but they may definitely play into what she's trying to do. I just wish the media would pay less attention to her and would focus on someone else who deserves it; if I never heard from her again I'd be a happy guy.
2006-11-30 01:33:24 · answer #3 · answered by dardekkis 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Cause she is a ****-*** from Southern Louisiana, that's pretty commonplace down there. You should try it...a little nut flash here and there can really pick you up during those rough times in your life!
2006-11-29 21:29:55 · answer #4 · answered by davinbrent_atx 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's not against the law to not wear underwear. Blame the paparazzi for that. Anyone that would go to the police & try to press charges on her for exposing her crotch is not attracted to females.
2006-12-01 19:14:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
this would make experience... because of the fact they are interior the well-known public-eye they do no longer look to be inevitably extra effective than us, only that they are an extension of our social society. So, we can see you to, on television, whilst ever you get your quarter-hour of repute. That does no longer make you experience such as you have been extra effective than me, good?
2016-10-13 10:18:36 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
my friend she can have her genitalia filmed as much as she wishes, it all depends where they publish them
2006-11-30 15:50:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
not antmore trailer trash since k-fed
2006-11-29 21:27:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Probably because she isn't doing it on purpose? Seriously, someone should tell her! It's disgusting.
2006-11-29 21:28:08 · answer #9 · answered by Sunrise 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Big deal?
2006-11-29 21:33:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋