English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you jump on the spot at the top of a mountain, will you jump higher than if you were at the bottom of the mountain?

2006-11-29 20:50:24 · 11 answers · asked by eLf 1 in Science & Mathematics Physics

11 answers

Gravity is an inverse square law for the further you are from the centre of mass the lower the graviational pull you feel. So yes gravity is less on the top of a mountain (and this has been measured) also these would be less air resistance as the air is of a lower density. These two factors would allow you to jump high, assuming you were on oxygen.

2006-11-29 20:54:40 · answer #1 · answered by Mark G 7 · 0 0

The mass of the Earth is a few billion cases extra desirable than the mass of Mount Everest. the completed Earth is pulling you down in the direction of its middle. The little bit of mass from the mountain would not upload that plenty, regardless of the undeniable fact that it does take you extra from the Earth's middle of mass, so which you may degree a very small drop in gravity on the precise. The inner maximum hollow ever drilled is 12 km, that's far less then 0.2% of a thank you to the middle of the Earth 6 378 km away. returned that's insignificant even nevertheless that's extra under floor than a transcontinental airliner flies above floor.

2016-10-13 10:17:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If you were to jump higher it would be down to the reduced air resistance rather than reduced gravity. Say you were at an altitude of 25,000 ft and in a balloon. Gravity would have a lesser effect upon you because you are 25,000 ft away from the large mass below. On top of a mountain at 25,000 ft, you still have a large mass exerting its gravitational pull downward upon you: a mountain.

2006-11-29 21:10:12 · answer #3 · answered by 13caesars 4 · 0 0

There is not much gravity. According to law of gravity when you are far away from the centre of earth you have less gravitation force. But at the same time air pressuere also increased. So at the same time you cant jump higher but it is less than that when you done it at surface or at bottom of that mountain

2006-11-29 21:07:22 · answer #4 · answered by Gul 1 · 0 0

Yes. The force of gravitational attraction is proportionate to the masses of the two bodies, divided by the square of the distance between their centres.

When you stand on a mountain, you are further from the centre of the earth than when you are on the plain below. Thus the distance square is greater, and the force is less.

When taking gravity measurements in geophysics, it is essential to know your altitude, so you can eliminate variations due to height; it also varies with latitude, and time of day (i.e. tides). Any other variations are thus due to differences in ground composition, which is what you're looking for.

A sensitive gravimeter can tell the difference between ground floor and third or fourth floor in a building.

That said, you wouldn't notice the difference yourself. The difference between sea level and the top of Everest is about 2 parts in a thousand!

2006-11-29 21:06:19 · answer #5 · answered by Paul FB 3 · 0 0

gravity is indeed an inverse square law, meaning, basicly, that the further you get from the mass the lower the effect is. if you stand on top of a mountain gravity does have a very slightly smaller effect on you, but it will not be noticable, the change in the effct will depend also on the size/density of the mountain.

2006-11-29 21:08:16 · answer #6 · answered by william k 2 · 0 0

There will be a very slight difference. That is why many olympic records for jumping events are created when the Olympic games are held at high elevation above sea level.

Also, many sprint race records are created at high elevations due to the thinner atmosphere up there.

Of course, for longer running events, the reduction in oxygen means that times for those events is slower.

2006-11-29 21:02:04 · answer #7 · answered by Mez 6 · 0 0

It would be dificult to measure but yes you would be able to jump higher but remember it would be harder to get the required oxygen into the lungs due to less air up there.

2006-11-29 21:09:26 · answer #8 · answered by burning brightly 7 · 0 0

der wont be much difference coz d height of d mountain may jus be 0.00000001 of earths radius... yes if u are accurate then it makek tat much of difference

2006-11-30 00:33:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Its a tiny bit lower.

2006-11-29 20:52:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers