English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i also heard he did it because he cant face himself and all his lies is that true? i am inclined to think so after all the lies he has told us about this war well thank god he is a lame duck and he no longer has absoute power, thanks to people like me who put the checks and balence back to the white house wont be utopia obviosly nither party has clean hands but at least now they can fight it out and its not such a dictatorship.

2006-11-29 19:47:46 · 5 answers · asked by kingers332002 3 in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

No, that's not why he did it... It's because Cheney kept breaking them.

Glass shards are dangerous, you know.

2006-11-29 20:57:04 · answer #1 · answered by Jeff S. 2 · 1 0

would this White abode were extra useful served to have provided sparkling, precise and undoctored responses to questions previously they blew up of their faces? to say they did not amend the tale on Benghazi and be stuck in that lie. to say (in very parsed words) they (Obama) and his White abode had no earlier information or the IRS scandal, even as it became on countless information comments over 2 years. To decrease back an AG that had to apply authorities Privilege to cover that's unlawful movements in Gun Runner. To have an AG that did not save on with the constrained scope of the regulation with the AP telephone record/twine faucets. If Obama and his Dept heads had purely informed the actuality the first time round there does no longer be countless listening to happening all mutually. Transparency became a fantasy they used to cajole some human beings to help them and it purely might want to backfire in 2014 and 2016.

2016-11-29 23:20:09 · answer #2 · answered by rieck 4 · 0 0

No actually it was the Clintons, and they removed dinnerware, silverware, artwork, electronics, furniture and just about everything else of value when they left. Typical hillbillies. They were like the looters in New Orleans.

Your blathering about President Bush is just that, unsubstantiated blathering. You should be ashamed of yourself for being such a liar.

2006-11-29 19:53:44 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 1 2

How do you guys convince yourself of these unsubstantiated facts.Then think you sound remotely intelligent.It must be nice
to be blithering idiot oh I mean a flunky for the Dems.

2006-11-29 20:13:20 · answer #4 · answered by josh m 5 · 0 1

No, he is an idiot, not a vampire.

2006-11-29 19:50:56 · answer #5 · answered by nesmith52 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers