English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Protest against Bush is so idiotic. Look at the side of those terrorist! They only wants as to suffer!!! Tnx to Bush he can erradicate these filts!!!

2006-11-29 19:05:54 · 24 answers · asked by nic4games 1 in Politics & Government Politics

24 answers

I'm for Bush

2006-11-29 19:07:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 5

Let this article answer this question!


Bush Nuts

Are George W. Bush lovers certifiable?

By Andy Bromage

November 23 2006

A collective “I told you so” will ripple through the world of Bush-bashers once news of Christopher Lohse’s study gets out.

Lohse, a social work master’s student at Southern Connecticut State University, says he has proven what many progressives have probably suspected for years: a direct link between mental illness and support for President Bush.

Lohse says his study is no joke. The thesis draws on a survey of 69 psychiatric outpatients in three Connecticut locations during the 2004 presidential election. Lohse’s study, backed by SCSU Psychology professor Jaak Rakfeldt and statistician Misty Ginacola, found a correlation between the severity of a person’s psychosis and their preferences for president: The more psychotic the voter, the more likely they were to vote for Bush.

But before you go thinking all your conservative friends are psychotic, listen to Lohse’s explanation.

“Our study shows that psychotic patients prefer an authoritative leader,” Lohse says. “If your world is very mixed up, there’s something very comforting about someone telling you, ‘This is how it’s going to be.’”

The study was an advocacy project of sorts, designed to register mentally ill voters and encourage them to go to the polls, Lohse explains. The Bush trend was revealed later on.

The study used Modified General Assessment Functioning, or MGAF, a 100-point scale that measures the functioning of disabled patients. A second scale, developed by Rakfeldt, was also used. Knowledge of current issues, government and politics were assessed on a 12-item scale devised by the study authors.

“Bush supporters had significantly less knowledge about current issues, government and politics than those who supported Kerry,” the study says.

Lohse says the trend isn’t unique to Bush: A 1977 study by Frumkin & Ibrahim found psychiatric patients preferred Nixon over McGovern in the 1972 election.

Rakfeldt says the study was legitimate, though not intended to show what it did.

“Yes it was a legitimate study but these data were mined after the fact,” Rakfeldt says. “You can ask new questions of the data. I haven’t looked at” Lohse’s conclusions regarding Bush, Rakfeldt says.

“That doesn’t make it illegitimate, it just wasn’t part of the original project.”

For his part, Lohse is a self-described “Reagan revolution fanatic” but said that W. is just “beyond the pale.” ●

abromage@newhavenadvocate.com

2006-11-29 23:16:51 · answer #2 · answered by stoner38 3 · 0 0

And a very fine job he is doing, too. We are in a war we cannot win, told lies about why we are there, alienating half the world's population against us, ignoring the Constitution & international law, something else---------AH! Got it! bankrupting the country (us, people) to line the pockets of multinational corporations. Ever hear of Halliburton?

Are you aware we have some military units going to Iraq for a 3rd tour of duty because we don't have the troops to replace them? How about the fact that none of the top civilian superiors of the military have combat experience? Or that the military brass responsible for carrying out those orders almost to a man say we
will lose Iraq to the insurgents without a total change in policy there? Meanwhile in Afghanistan, the situation is going out of control. If we are lucky, the Europeans might be able to stabilize that area, because we are spread too thin to do it.

And as Commander in Chief, he is responsible for all this.

2006-11-29 19:37:33 · answer #3 · answered by bob h 5 · 1 0

Bush is a extensive element of the present republican record. in 2000 republicans in fact ran against Clinton... you run a platform on what has been finished now no longer what somebody, who you do now no longer even understand who this is going to likely be, could desire to do. you're pretend result what structures are. they're somewhat lots consistently present day subject vs what the candidate could desire to do distinctive or an comparable. each and all the republicans in 2000 ran on ethical administration and restoring dignity to the Whitehouse... this wasn't Gore's meant susceptible spot. Ron Paul is in fact working against Bush besides.

2016-12-29 17:00:40 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Hell no! Bush is a dumbas*, he is a present day Hitler. I liked Bill Clinton way better, hopefully democrat will take over in the next election.

2006-11-29 19:53:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No I'm not against to President Bush. Actually he is not our president Im from other country. As what I had understand , he is doing his best for his people. But some people don't understand what his doing. Bush is a good president but he is not a perfect president. Because no body is perfect in this world.

2006-11-29 19:23:17 · answer #6 · answered by MAGNIFICENT 2 · 4 2

I am against Bush, but not for terrorist, so please dont make the ignorant remark that I'm anti-American. Thant said....

I believe Americans try to simplify the problem of terrorism way too much. If you watch any news, you would know that Bush's policies have actually increased the use of terrorism throughout the world. This was published by his own gov't and is very obvious that he caused this. I mean seriously, what did you expect to happen when we invaded a country? People to just sit around as thousands of civilians die!?

Learn your history people before you get on here and blindly support our President. He has caused more casualties by his wars in Afghanistan and Iraq than any terrorist has caused in the history of mankind!

2006-11-29 19:13:35 · answer #7 · answered by Michael K 2 · 1 5

Your question has a double negative. I just thought you should know that. And since when did being against Bush means siding with the terrorists?

2006-11-29 19:09:25 · answer #8 · answered by Patricia 3 · 2 3

Bush is only a figurehead and it is not his personal courage, it is the combined decisions of his cabinet and congress. He has done nothing. The government has led the US into another quagmire as in Vietnam. There will not be a win and many people will die before we withdraw.

2006-11-29 19:09:56 · answer #9 · answered by Frank 6 · 3 2

I support President Bush, but I also respect the opinions of those who don't, so long as it's for good reasons.

2006-11-29 19:10:14 · answer #10 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 2 2

I support my president. Although I dont agree with everything he has done, I still support him. Everyone is just using him as a scapegoat. Im really tired of all these whinny people who say the dumbest stuff. Like claiming we kill millions of people. I proudly serve my country and I am proud of the other people who serve. I remember right after 9/11 when almost everyone was for kicking some butt, now its different. Bunch of whinny, spoiled Americans who complain because they dont realize how good they have it. We (U.S. military) do not go out looking to rape, kill, and destroy like many of you liberals claim. To those of you who claim the Presidents daughters should be forced to serve need to get a clue. Thats whats great about a voluntary military, you dont have to serve and many of you Im glad you arent forced to be here because I couldnt deal with your whining and not wanting to serve.

2006-11-29 19:15:40 · answer #11 · answered by redneckking_99 3 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers