2006-11-29 18:32:25 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
mmmm mink.
but then, being a werewolf, I probably eat a little different than you good folks.
2006-11-29 18:42:50 · update #1
i think its ok to wear both. i mean what did they wear in the old days to keep warm. people just think that if you wear fur its horrible cause it comes from an animal but so does leather so i don't see the difference. if i had somewhere fancy to go i would wear my fur coat i don't care. its no different then what the did in the good old days to keep warm.
2006-11-29 18:42:07 · answer #1 · answered by kameo_44 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Generally, to get the leather the cow must die and the rest of the cow will be used for hamburger, steaks roasts etc. and the leather or hide is then only a biproduct. The cow is slaughtered for more than it's "leather". Fur on the other hand is not accepted because people kill pretty much for the fur. When was the last time you had a mink burger?
2006-11-29 18:40:52 · answer #2 · answered by Lumpy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seeing that I am strongly against fur, it is not okay to wear leather. Most leather comes from cows, but a lot of it comes from many different animals including pigs, sheep, ostriches etc. Look it all the UGGS out there during the winter. They are made out of sheepskin. Some people are ignorant to think that ALL leather is a byproduct of the meat industry. Leather is the skin without the fur, so there really is no physical difference between the two.
2006-11-29 20:38:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I do devour meat, because it really is farmed for that reason, and quite somewhat each and every thing on a cow it truly is slaughtered for meat is used. (meat for us and dogs/cats, the cover for leather-depending, the hooves and different factors are dried for canines treats). i do no longer placed on fur, because to me purely slaughtering an animal for its pelt purely is incorrect. yet sure, human beings are "omnivores", which ability they were made to devour plant AND animal, and that i'm an omnivore. And even as i became little PETA appeared like a reliable element yet once i became older and realized that they were declaring i could not even bypass fishing reason that became incorrect, properly no extra PETA for me! (they have helped some in getting situations better for lab animals, and making some farms and circuses extra humane-which i'm inquisitive about) yet they bypass overboard even as they get into peoples faces and attempt to rigidity their evaluations. for that reason (the farms, and so on) they are like an substantial evil, they do a touch reliable yet to boot bypass overboard any opposite direction.
2016-11-29 23:17:14 · answer #4 · answered by erke 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I read an interesting answer to this question and here it is...... .. .The 'no fur' lobbyists are more than willing to throw blood on a rich yuppie wearing fur .. .. ..than a biker/motorcyclist wearing leather. the theory being 'obviously they'd get their as_ kicked'.
2006-11-29 18:48:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
because the rest of the animal is used but with fur it's mainly the baby ones and just for the fur
2006-11-29 18:34:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you're truly against wearing fur you're gonna protest the leather...
2006-11-29 18:34:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's ok the wear fake leather and fur.
Never anything with animal hide in it.
2006-11-29 18:34:13 · answer #8 · answered by Nicky 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Exactly my point!
Pamela Anderson is a fake b*tch she wears leathers and make-up and most make-ups are tested on animals!
The truth really hurts!
2006-11-29 18:48:40 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There are people that have a problem with leather too. Personally, I like both.
2006-11-29 18:34:11 · answer #10 · answered by i luv teh fishes 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋