English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They are both similar type of strikers..But for me Ruddi is better..He will be the better in the past and present he scored more goals for his club and he already plays in a stronger league..

just thought of knowing who you guys think is better out of these two
who do you think is better?

2006-11-29 18:04:06 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football English Football

15 answers

I would say Ruud van Nistelrooy because he scored more goals and playing well in 3 different leagues in his career but Klose also not bad.. he is an important striker of germany team but i think he will improve if he playing in other leagues.

2006-11-29 18:51:45 · answer #1 · answered by kharix 2 · 0 0

Ruud Van Nistelrooy is better than klose

2006-11-30 10:38:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ruud was better, but now he's over the hill and klose is better. maybe you've missed that last 2 world cups, and the show that klose has put on. he gets slept on because he plays in the bundesliga, and ruud played for man u where he got a ton of pub that he wouldn't have gotten elsewhere even with the same number. and if you compare their stats, they are fairly comparable in terms of goals per game. and also, ruud really stuffed his stats playing for a second division team for a while, so that tips the balance a bit

2006-11-29 20:01:49 · answer #3 · answered by C_Millionaire 5 · 0 0

For me, it must be Klose!!!

His influence for Werder Bremen and Germany is significantly important. Whereas, RVN is not so influential for Holland!!!

Klose is better in the air and can make great runs whereas although RVN has a great scoring record, he is more of a ronaldo type of player - big size > bully as in no defender can close him down without a 50-50 change of fouling him, and he does a lot of tap-ins!!!

2006-11-29 20:01:52 · answer #4 · answered by junnyo 2 · 0 1

RVN is way better, he sniffs out chances better than anyone and isn't afraid to pick up the garbage, but at the same rate he's also better striker than Klose.

2006-11-29 19:58:21 · answer #5 · answered by Ben W 1 · 0 0

I'm going with Nistelrooy aswell.
He's just such a natural goal scorer

2006-11-29 19:19:41 · answer #6 · answered by _______ 3 · 0 0

without a doubt, Ruud van Nistelrooy.

2006-11-30 00:03:56 · answer #7 · answered by foongwk140804 7 · 1 0

Klose is better! Nistelrooy got many opportunity for score but his opportunity had been throwed away by his own "rude"! You can see he shoot a penalty...THAT'S SUCK!

2006-11-29 19:17:53 · answer #8 · answered by Sean T 1 · 0 1

RVN. He's proved himself in the EPL and La Liga, so far anyway.

2006-11-29 23:07:32 · answer #9 · answered by fubar18ad 5 · 0 0

nistelrooy is better since he has been good for real madrid

2006-11-29 21:06:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers