English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

His war on terror hasn't gone anywhere lately, so Dubya has taken to kicking over bowls and entire tureens of "unpatriotic chowders, stews, and bouillions that threaten our good American families". Right now he's trudging out of a local cafeteria after dispatching some "insurgent 3-bean surprise"....uhm...okay........

2006-11-29 16:51:33 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

As a chef i take great offense at this latest offense.
The Boosh must be stopped or no bouillabaisse is safe.

2006-11-29 16:56:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

how many liberals supported the fashionable conflict? the conflict of 1812? the civil conflict? the spanish american conflict? the 1st worl conflict? the 2d international conflict? and how amy conservatives supported the? help for or against a conflict, for despite reason, isn't a leberal/conservative place, yet a query of why we would desire to continually circulate to conflict. the present conflict against terrorism replaced into, ans is supported by using maximum folk. it is the unnecessry conflict in iraq, which replaced into in accordance with fake suggestion, fake assumptions, and out good lies, which ,many have come to disagree with. i went to viet nam willingly, yet decrease back confident that we couyld no longer win because of the fact the politicians have been waqging the conflict and not the protection stress who would desire to have been given something needed to win. the political climate, which maintains on the instant, in basic terms starts off yet won't bring about winning a conflict. the protection stress can winn, yet no longer until their is a real want on the president's desire to win, and not in basic terms play well-known on the price of yankee lives.

2016-10-13 10:07:34 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Seriously

2006-11-29 17:08:51 · answer #3 · answered by josh m 5 · 0 0

War on pretzels.

2006-11-29 18:44:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i think he should start a war on sarcasm.

2006-11-29 16:54:06 · answer #5 · answered by list 3 · 0 1

Not true!!! Funny how democrats can't discuss real issues!!!!

2006-11-29 22:15:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers