Australia and New Hamshire have approved the immunisation of girls against the a virus that causes cervical cancer in 95% of cases of cervical cancer. Is there any funds coming from teh white house to immunise ever girl in the USA? nope
another failure of the free enterprise model of health care
It should be noted that like candian consumers , australian consumers pay up to 75% of the cost of drugs than americans do.
2006-11-29 16:47:58 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
If they wanted you to have health care, they would give it to you in some way that was affordable and effective. The fact is, in their paradigm, if you cannot afford it, you shouldn't have it. It is difficult to accept this as reality, but it is true. They say they are pro-life, but as you show here, when it comes to supporting life, they are nowhere to be found. That is their health care plan.
2006-11-29 16:52:03 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What health policy. The Bush Administration redirected every social fund to the war profiteers.
2006-11-30 00:51:06 · answer #2 · answered by Reba K 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Right, because when the government takes a project away from the private industries, it's ALWAYS more cost effective and better run with less money and red tape.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
2006-11-30 00:57:29 · answer #3 · answered by asshat.mcpoop 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think it's a failure... if they don't want you to have it...
I'm not sure... but I think the health care industry is TRYING REALLY, REALLY HARD TO BE EVEN LESS EFFICIENT THAN GOVERNMENTS... they seem to be succeeding...
2006-11-30 00:58:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's really sad that you blame so called 'neocons' for that.
2006-11-30 01:41:33 · answer #5 · answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋