English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If so, what did you think of it? Did you feel like you had read it before?

2006-11-29 16:11:27 · 11 answers · asked by dakota29575 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

11 answers

It's just more of this fool telling some Americans what they wish to hear. The truth of this man is that he is a thug. He participated in the hostage taking during the Carter years and will not rest until Israel, America, the UK and every western influence nation is either wiped out or converts to his perverted version of Islamic religion.

Edit: Zahier, read this - Weapons of mass destruction (WMD) generally include nuclear, biological, chemical and, increasingly, radiological weapons. The term first arose in 1937 in reference to the mass destruction of Guernica, Spain, by aerial bombardment. Following the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and progressing through the Cold War, the term came to refer more to non-conventional weapons. ...

There WERE WMD based on this definition. Barrels of chemical weapons. What do you think he murdered the Kurds with, dirty language?

2006-11-29 16:40:10 · answer #1 · answered by Rich B 5 · 1 4

I consider maximum of it. yet because the first poster refill the get bypass stated' The Obama authorities.'. She wasn't speaking about purely the Obama authorities. She change into speaking about authorities commonly. Democrat and Republican. The tarp funds, which change into delivered up two times, change into voted in on Bush's watch. He might want to have vetoed it yet he did not. save in thoughts Conservatives, she stated all authorities. and that i agree. If truly 'we are coming'. we are coming for both Republicans and Democrats

2016-10-07 23:57:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Every free and real American should read the letter to understand what the other side is saying.

2006-11-29 16:52:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Yes and he makes a lot of sense, to ignore his request for dialog is not only arrogant but could prove to be a disaster for our troops, and if Bush decides to take them on look out draft dodgers in the making as it will be back, as the military is stretched too thin now as it is! not hearing the others point of view is stupidity, and maybe why America is so divided

2006-11-29 23:12:30 · answer #4 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0 2

I did not read the letter. I did listen to him at the United Nations. We should be very worried about this man. He books no good for us.

2006-11-29 16:46:05 · answer #5 · answered by patricia p 2 · 2 2

Yes and some things that he had said are correct some are npt as President Bush has his own timetable and he is not thinking about the soldiers USA has lost not his fault but it was fate as HE CONJURED UP THE WMD stuff just to occupy a country which could have been destroyed by a few ICBM's

2006-11-29 16:16:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

Total garbage pleding for sympathy to the Libs & Cons to try and back his adgenda. When our news service's start translating his speeches correctly. You will find that this man (Iran Pres.) is worse than Adolf Hitler. His plans for the US, Israel & the rest of the non muslim world as he has layed out in other speeches is for him to rule the world in the name of Islam.

2006-11-29 16:26:01 · answer #7 · answered by oilfieldinsultant 3 · 2 4

I think he is a jerk, but he is not my president. Jerky letter too!
I feel the same.

2006-11-29 16:18:53 · answer #8 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 2 3

I saw it..but it was to long to read

2006-11-29 16:16:59 · answer #9 · answered by katjha2005 5 · 0 2

Have no interest to read it.

2006-11-29 16:14:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers