remember waco....also remember a little boy who's Mother died bringing him to freedom....only to have the gestapo bust in his house and grab him at gunpoint.....gee I havent seen that even since 9/11.....
2006-11-29 16:02:48 · 9 answers · asked by Rick D 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Any Americans been dragged out of their house lately except drug dealers....My point was...and
you libs missed it..was...clinton turned his own military on its own people...
Bush has not done that....so screw you dimwits
2006-11-29 16:58:37 · update #1
How many times do I have to explain this? Clinton is a Dem, & therefore not capable of ever being wrong. Bush is a Rep & therefore not capable of being right.
See how easy it is when you don't have to do your own thinking?
2006-11-29 16:06:16 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 19⤊ 4⤋
Sooner or later, everyone should realize that no appreciable difference exists between the two parties. Yeah, they have their respective platforms, but ultimately the whine and moan list of complaints all depends on who has the power. Prime example, the party flip of 94, when the R's took power from the D's. Prior to the flip, the R's were all about term limits and the D's said no need, same for finance reform. Then the party flip and overnight thier respective positions on these issues flipped too. That was the end of my belief in the R party. Now, I trust neither party to do what is right. They only do what's best for themselves and the lobbyists who pull their strings.
As for crying about no freedom, the R's strip our freedom through the back door - wire taps, executive privilige - and the D's seek to do it through the front door - strip the 2nd amend., outlaw everything they deem to be bad for us. Either way, we lose.
Real freedom carries risk, be it from terrorists or from our own stupidity. Personally, I choose freedom and risk over enslavement and 'security'.
2006-11-30 00:14:23 · answer #2 · answered by Blue 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Waco and Ruby Ridge were not high points for Janet Reno, that is for certain.
I was against both of them, but yo can see how one voice carries no weight
2006-11-30 00:06:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
... you're comparing what Bush is doing to waco?
you call that "gestapo" but not what Bush has been doing?
if you think what Clinton did was gestapo, you should be gathering up your guns against Bush... geez...
you're complaining about a hangnail, while someone is about to chop off your arm...
2006-11-30 00:09:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Double straw man with a twist. Very intoxicating. And incomprehensible.
2006-11-30 00:37:24 · answer #5 · answered by Jonathan T 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Timothy McVeigh line lives, I see.
2006-11-30 00:12:54 · answer #6 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i know plenty of people who you would probably consider 'liberal' that are still angry about waco...
2006-11-30 00:09:29 · answer #7 · answered by list 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
AND STILL AGAINST THE LAW--REPUBS STILL SCREAMING ABOUT ILLEGALS--EVEN WANT A FENCE BWT TEXAS AND MEXICO.
WHY DON'T YOU SHUT UP .
2006-11-30 00:07:00 · answer #8 · answered by cork 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Your idiot president is about to lose the war publicly, and you waste your time on this?????????????
2006-11-30 00:06:34 · answer #9 · answered by NightShade 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋