You are 100% right
2006-11-30 02:48:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
people that come to these question and answer sites to make statements and ask no question are a joke. tna isn't what they started out to be. they have given it a good try. but wwe has no choice to make legends of the talent they have, when you only have 15 wrestlers you have 15 legends.there are a few more than 15 I know, but all you see in the wwe is booger t, findley and steven regal against the animal, lashly and I for get the other guy he is a real legend I can't even remember his name.yes i agree though umaga would wipe his rear end with samoa doe boy as you call him.and as for stinger he doesn't have it anymore, but when he did there was none better! as far as that goes I would like to see you in the ring with just one of these guys. but I was a christian for 14 yrs, I can understand where sting is coming from when wcw went under he became a preacher and spread God,s word along with nakita koloff, ted debiasy, and ivan koloff. there is nothing wrong with that. tna want last long. let em enjoy it while it lasts. I have been watching wrestling since the early 70's and been in wrestling since 1997, hey tna want last you will see.
2006-11-29 16:00:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
First of all WWE like Samoa Joe but Samoa Joe didn't want to come to TNA so Vince made his own version of Samoa Joe.....Umaga who wouldn't kick his ***..........trust me.
TNA's majority share owner is a billion dollar and they have been getting more ratings lately while WWE have been losing ratings.TNA has become so big now they might be on TV for 2 hours and they are even bringing out a video game next year,Vince is worried because WWE has lost so many viewers but TNA has been gaining.TNA chants have been chanted at WWE shows lately and WWE have been copying TNA with their gimmicks(WWE got Umaga's character from Samoa Joe when Vince offered Joe a contract but Joe refused so Vince made Umaga.
Just face it TNA is getting better every week and so many WWE superstars leave on their own terms to go to TNA.
2006-11-30 11:17:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by HHH 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I do not quite know what you're asking, but this would be my line up if WWE and TNA were to go head to head:
VooDoo Kin Mafia vs. DX (easy win for DX)
Samoa Joe vs. Umaga
Sting vs. Undertaker
AJ Styles vs. John Cena
Team 3D vs. Rated RKO
Abyss vs. Kane
Christian Cage vs. Batista
Kurt Angle vs. Vince McMahon
2006-11-29 16:03:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Glen R 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dear god....you are an idiot.
I don't have the time to waste explaining how you have no idea what you are talking about. I've already responded to enough of the WWE kiddie marks on here for one day.
Don't get me wrong, TNA isn't nearly the quality of Ring Of Honor, but it's a hell of a lot better than the nonsense at WWE.
2006-11-30 03:57:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Monty Brown vs Lashley
D-X vs vkm
Abyss vs Taker
Samoa Joe vs Benoit
Batista vs Rhyno
LAX vs Hardy Boyz
These would be great matches
2006-11-30 00:58:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that isn't any longer the "customary" followers that dislike one yet another (I watch each and every of the wrestling shows, WWE and TNA... i do not hate myself both). the dislike comes from what you are able to assume to discover in any area the position there are competing selections, extremely a subset of those who're polarized a lot for selection "X" that they shun "Y" because it really is purely "no longer X" and would't take the view of somebody else and spot what somebody else might want to like about "Y" and unlike about "X". So no matter if the polarized opinion is formed through an recommended own selection (tried it, did not like it) or uninformed selection (I received't like it, so no favor to even attempt it)... you'll have the polarized human beings taking an fairly vocal stance in want of "X" and slamming "Y", and could react negatively to any grievance of "X" no matter if valid, and ignore about something constructive about "Y", no matter if valid. despite the indisputable fact that, i imagine maximum followers are average, they could see the sturdy and undesirable with WWE and TNA and would contact upon both elements of both merchandising, and are not out to troll and ask questions purely to impact the opposing view.
2016-10-07 23:56:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have fun watching WWE's male cheerleaders, old men with there shirtsoff, two forty year old men telling dick jokes, there boring DQ style finishes, have fun watching Charlie haas be wasted on Heat, have fun watching divas play high card when they advertised poker, have fun watching a fat man with a thong on. If thats your type of "entertainment", make sure to wash your hands when your done.
2006-11-29 23:49:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by MikeAwesome 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
You took the words right out from my mouth.
2006-11-30 00:59:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by WWE Champ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
tna is nothing.
look at somoa joe hes kinda fat (no offense)
look at kurt angle,raven,kevin nash,sting,chritin cage(christian),and team 3D if it was not for wwe they would have never been in tna.
2006-11-29 23:34:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋