English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I do. Many detractors write him off based on superficial considerations, but the music is very intense and moving, and the lyrics are just as compelling, with multiple layers of meaning. He seems to capture many aspects of life, from the social/political to the aesthetic/existential -- sometimes in one stroke. Not to mention his theatrics and makeup. Do you agree fellow Manson enthusiasts?

2006-11-29 13:49:00 · 7 answers · asked by NietzcheanCowboy 3 in Entertainment & Music Music

7 answers

Well, you'd assume that fellow enthusiasts would agree - I doubt many others will, or even be qualified to judge.

2006-11-29 13:52:18 · answer #1 · answered by Minmi 6 · 0 2

complicated to assert, relies upon lots on my temper and much greater on which album. I commonly HATE lady vocals, yet Shirley is on of the few exceptions. she is an exceptionally great singer, for a girl. all of rubbish's albums are a minimum of ok, and the vocals are between the highlights. Marilyn Manson could be a genuine git at cases, and if we've been going by making use of maximum contemporary artwork Shirly could be the clean winner. He probable has much less making a music tallent than Shirley, yet his artwork - while it quite is solid - is greater thrilling. His first album - Portrait of an American relatives - is one among my all-time favourites, yet a great style of what i like approximately it quite is the instrumental stuff, which i do no longer think of he had that lots to do with. returned-in-the-day although his lyrics have been quite beautiful and he had an thrilling character he portraied. Now he seems to have taken it slightly some distance. in short - they're too distinctive to verify. It'[s no longer even comparing apples and oranges, greater like comparing apples and sausages.

2016-12-13 17:05:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, only in the past few years, when I've heard Manson talk in interviews, etc., do I label him as brilliant. He is one of the few artists today, that is ahead of his time...
his popularity, I believe, has diminshed slightly since the Columbine shootings, the end of 90s grunge (Cobain suicide), G n R breakup...he came out at a time when record execs and mainstream America wanted happy pappy crap...Rock and roll was becoming too dangerous again for most parents to want their children to listen to...so we regressed to commercialism, not art. Trying to be Manson since then...in the midst of the Spice Girls, Britney, B.Boys...in the age of commerical industry (not art) in the music scene has just gone to show how far ahead he is compared to most other performers...he is dangerously real in his music and performance. A true artist that speaks volumes, and should be listened to.

2006-11-29 13:55:26 · answer #3 · answered by Happier in China 2 · 4 1

Sorry, I don't get nor connect with his music.

In my opinon, Gary Numan goes way beyond in the studio & live.
I think he's been highly underrated for decades.

2006-11-29 14:02:26 · answer #4 · answered by george g 5 · 0 1

Someone once said Marilyn was the David Bowie of the 21st century, I have to disagree...

2006-11-29 13:52:19 · answer #5 · answered by Robert B 7 · 1 2

Underrated hell,he's wasting my air.If you want to speak to satan just talk to maryjane manson.

2006-11-29 14:00:58 · answer #6 · answered by harleyman 3 · 1 4

I like him for his music...not for him...HE is wierd but his music is wonderful

2006-11-29 13:51:12 · answer #7 · answered by mastercody07 2 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers