2006-11-29 13:37:19 · 13 answers · asked by smiling is cute 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I am asking two conradictory Questions. One of the two options will come to pass go on record what are your views?
Could be the defining issue of the century.
2006-11-29 13:40:57 · update #1
the price of liberty is eternal vigilance..to accept the weapon in the hands of known terrorist sympathisers is risky at best...you may be comfortable with this type of national security issue...IM NOT.
2006-11-29 13:40:42 · answer #1 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No
The US should accept Iran in a State of Nuclear Fallout
2006-11-29 21:47:11 · answer #2 · answered by rjf 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
probably not. because they not only pose a threat to us, but to the whole world. All of the other nuclear states, excepting North Korea, have proved that they are responsible enough to know that if these weapons are used, there is no going back. Iran's president shows no sign of having self control and nuclear weapons should not be at his disposal.
2006-11-29 21:40:16 · answer #3 · answered by smartass 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
we dont have a choice, we are the first and only country to use one agaisnt another people in a time of war. so who are we to decide? Iran is not our enemy as others have claimed, they di not attack us on 9/11 the highjckers and financers were all Saudi Arabains, and we sure as hell don't need them for friends.
2006-11-29 21:41:57 · answer #4 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
At this point, I question whether Iran should even continue to be.
2006-11-29 21:43:17 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
if they ever actually get a nuclear weapons program together, which is at least 8-10 years away (if that's even what they're trying to do- which a recent cia report found no firm evidence of)
2006-11-29 21:40:35 · answer #6 · answered by list 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
My feeling is that if one country has nuclear weapons, all should be allowed to have the capability.
2006-11-29 21:48:53 · answer #7 · answered by Herman Munster 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. We have a right to defend ourselves. Iran is our enemy. They get nukes and Israel goes first, then a major American city.
2006-11-29 21:38:40 · answer #8 · answered by GOPneedsarealconservative 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. That would be against our best interest & the best interests of our allies. We need to stop them.
2006-11-29 21:39:22 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We take care of them the way we do every country with WMD's
2006-11-29 21:41:07 · answer #10 · answered by Truth Erector 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋