I'm not buying the "stifles creativity" arguments nor am I buying the "forces conformity" jag. I believe that a uniform actually makes people work HARDER to stand out and be creative (ie: their physical image alone carries no weight). I also believe that in life one needs to understand when the *appearance* of conforming is in their best interest (ask anyone in a successful career). But a uniform does not mean conformation - at least it didn't to the slutty catholic school girls I used to date, smoke dope and drink with...
I think uniforms are a great equalizer.
2006-11-29 11:51:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Makakio 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
rate is my best issue! i do not recognize what colleges the different commenters have considered, yet the position i'm the uniforms (in straight forward words one public college in the area has uniforms, and that i do not recognize a lot about the community inner most faculties) $25 for a pair of pants for a 7 12 months previous, and some days later he journeys getting off the college bus and rips a hollow in the pants, and then you may want to purchase a sparkling pair because he won't be able to bypass to college with ripped pants. no longer to teach shirts ($15 each and every) and a blazer ($40). i'm searching on the college's information superhighway web site immediately. And those are for little childrens. Messy, clumsy, instantly-starting to be small little ones. once in a while you're able to discover between the uniform parts used, despite the indisputable fact that that isn't any longer worry-free. the college doesn't manage any way of recycling the uniforms, and prefer I already said, childrens are magnificent at destroying clothing. also, that is unhappy to be sure those little childrens in only one coloration. i'm no longer completely adversarial to it, yet i imagine that the college might want to a minimum of supply them coloration selections. Is it truly goign to be THAT distracting to positioned on a pink blouse, at the same time as the youngster sitting next to you is wearing a blue one, and the youngster on the different area is wearing a white one? Is it truly going to reason THAT a lot competition? i imagine a strict gown code can be a miles better ideal idea than a uniform. it would want to serve an same objective, yet you ought to purchase issues less expensive, and promises the youngsters some selection in what they positioned on. in straight forward words sturdy colored, button-up collared shirts, and black pants. effective. each and every youngster receives to %. his/her personal coloration.
2016-10-07 23:42:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I had to wear uniforsm in middle school, and it was no big deal. Frankly, people can say it stifiles creativity and changes peoples forsm of expression, but I totally diagree. Cloths can not define who you are. If someone can only dress to express themself, they they must not have much a a statment to make. Let them get out of school to do that. A school is for learning. Alot of people dont havethe money to dress the popular way, and they get made fun of because of it. Middle School is where the most making fun of and bulling comes from. Sure, they will get made fun of for other things, but at least not cloths wise. Most people who say it stifiles cretaivty have never worn them. It might not make kids smarter, but I am sure it lessens the pressure of dressing a certin way. The cloths dont make a person, the person makes the cloths.
As for affording uniforms, it makes it easier. If the kid could only afford a few pairs of shirts and pants, that would be enough. The family would in all relaity only need 2 pairs of shirts and pants for the uniform, and if you really want to get into it, only one shirt and pant. It is harder to do it with out unifrosm, becuase people will notice if someone only has a few pairs of clothes.
I am not saying I liked wearing uniforms, but I did not HATE it. It was nto a big deal, and people who say it is have not had to wear them. Besides in many professsions, you HAVE to dress a certin way.
2006-11-29 11:48:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by quest 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
because it stops them from showing their creativity
it doesnt help kids learn better
and because the families that cant afford both uniforms and regular clothes
unless it is a military school i dont think kids should be required to wear them
i had to do a report about this two years ago
great question
2006-11-29 11:47:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by AmandaPaige 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it promotes conformity and only makes the kids' teen angst worsen because they cannot express themselves how they want through their clothes. Also there is no research that says wearing uniforms helps kids or makes them learn better.
2006-11-29 11:40:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by fruitcakeweather 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
because no one wants to get up every morning and put on the same clothes
2006-11-29 11:43:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
because it stifles creativity and self-expression
2006-11-29 11:40:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋