YES YES -Oh My Goodness- YES!!!
Government social programs scream "No Daddy Needed". It decreases responsible reproductive behavior by removing the consequences of producing children that someone cannot afford to care for.
The illegitimacy rate has increased tremendously since "The Great Society" social programs. It is not a coincidence.
Before social programs if someone had a child out of wedlock, the family had to come together to financially care for the child. It was a burden on the family and it was looked down upon. Now, much of that responsibility has been shifted from family to taxpayers. Just go to the local government office to get a check.
Reducing responsibility for one's actions does exactly that - it reduces responsible behavior. People pay less attention to their actions.
It has nothing to do with whether a person is a good or bad person. It has everything to do with the fact removing consequences for a particular behavior, will increase that behavior. It is basic human nature.
It is not only producing children that this applies.
If your boss reduces the consequences of showing up late for work, you will show up late more often.
If a police officers stopped giving tickets and only gave warnings to speeders, people would speed more often.
.
2006-11-29 12:18:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Zak 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Being professional-decision, and believing that a woman has administration over her decision to proceed to be pregnant, i could be a hypocrite if i did no longer additionally say that she has administration over her reproductive skills. that's a scientific and common rights answer. yet i'm additionally a pragmatist, and socially, i'm a sprint serious of the completed thought. and not for the statistical motives you state, as i've got faith that if a discern (parent) is a robust one, with the excellent help shape, they are able to advance super toddlers. yet i'm fascinated interior the financial build of the area. of course, if a woman can cope with to pay for the overwhelmingly extreme value of having a toddler, then she would desire to have an excellent activity. And if thats the case, what hours does she artwork? who is going to be raising that toddler? In my 1920s, I had desperate that if I wasn't married by using 35, i wanted to have a toddler on my own. nicely, 35 arrived, and that i found out that i did no longer have the money or the emotional skill to advance a toddler on my own. as much as i could have enjoyed a toddler at that factor, i actually felt that it could have been an irresponsible and selfish decision for me to make. definite, I honestly have the excellent to have a toddler biologically, yet do I honestly have the ethical and responsible good to have one if i'm no longer able to provide them each thing they desire in terms of time and dedication?
2016-10-13 09:37:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Prior to the welfare reform in the mid 90's there was some effect. Since then the welfare rolls have been falling while the number of single parent families have been increasing, The vast majority of single parent families are never on welfare. Divorce, and changing social values have a much greater effect.
2006-11-30 01:37:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by meg 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
MYTH: Most of the people on welfare are unmarried mothers who have extra children so that they can get more money.
FACT: Although one in four children under 18 receives welfare benefits, that does not mean that a few women on welfare have lots of children. From official government figures, "The average monthly number of TANF families was 3,176,000 in fiscal year (FY) 1998. The estimated total number of TANF recipients was 2,631,000 adults and 6,273,000 children. The average number of persons in TANF families was 2.8 persons. The TANF families averaged 2 recipient children, which remained unchanged. Two in five families had only one child. One in 10 families had more than three children."
2006-12-01 11:52:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jennifer D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No! I don't know of any woman in the world that would want to raise a child or two by herself just to get a little help from the government.
There may be programs out there to help womaen in bad relationships survive better on there own so they don't have to depend on someone else. But I don't think married women would see this as anopprotunity to leave a relationship.
2006-11-29 11:35:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Keith 2
·
0⤊
1⤋